Literature DB >> 9112436

Polynucleotidyl transfer reactions in site-specific DNA recombination.

K Mizuuchi1.   

Abstract

Site-specific DNA rearrangement reactions are widespread among organisms. They are used, for example, by vertebrates to boost immune response diversity, and in turn by parasitic organisms to evade the host immune system by surface antigen switching. Parasitic genetic elements ubiquitous to most organisms invade new host genomic sites by a variety of types of site-specific recombination. Polynucleotidyl transfer reactions are central to these DNA recombination reactions. The recombinase of each reaction system that 'catalyses' such chemical reactions at specific DNA sites are apparently designed to accomplish unique DNA geometrical specificity, or delicate control over the extent or direction of the reaction, with the sacrifice of protein turnover. Here we discuss our current understanding of several issues that relate to the polynucleotidyl transfer steps in several of the better studied site-specific recombination reactions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9112436     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1997.970297.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Cells        ISSN: 1356-9597            Impact factor:   1.891


  25 in total

1.  Catalytic center of an archaeal type 2 ribonuclease H as revealed by X-ray crystallographic and mutational analyses.

Authors:  A Muroya; D Tsuchiya; M Ishikawa; M Haruki; M Morikawa; S Kanaya; K Morikawa
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Mutational analysis of RAG1 and RAG2 identifies three catalytic amino acids in RAG1 critical for both cleavage steps of V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  M A Landree; J A Wibbenmeyer; D B Roth
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Mutations of acidic residues in RAG1 define the active site of the V(D)J recombinase.

Authors:  D R Kim; Y Dai; C L Mundy; W Yang; M A Oettinger
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Organization and dynamics of the Mu transpososome: recombination by communication between two active sites.

Authors:  T L Williams; E L Jackson; A Carritte; T A Baker
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  The solution structure of the C-terminal domain of the Mu B transposition protein.

Authors:  L H Hung; G Chaconas; G S Shaw
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Telomere resolution in the Lyme disease spirochete.

Authors:  G Chaconas; P E Stewart; K Tilly; J L Bono; P Rosa
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Tipping the balance between replicative and simple transposition.

Authors:  N P Tavakoli; K M Derbyshire
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Determinants for hairpin formation in Tn10 transposition.

Authors:  J S Allingham; S J Wardle; D B Haniford
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  IHF-independent assembly of the Tn10 strand transfer transpososome: implications for inhibition of disintegration.

Authors:  Barry J Stewart; Simon J Wardle; David B Haniford
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  How the BfiI restriction enzyme uses one active site to cut two DNA strands.

Authors:  Giedrius Sasnauskas; Stephen E Halford; Virginijus Siksnys
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.