Literature DB >> 9112116

Effect of stimulus level and frequency on ABR and MLR binaural interaction in human neonates.

B Cone-Wesson1, E Ma, C G Fowler.   

Abstract

Auditory brainstem (ABR) and middle latency (MLR) responses were evoked by click and tone-burst stimuli from human neonates. Electrophysiologic evidence of binaural interaction was measured by subtracting waveforms obtained for binaural stimulus conditions from waveforms obtained for the sum of right ear monaural and left ear monaural stimulus conditions. The effects of stimulus level and stimulus frequency on binaural interaction were evaluated by measuring the number, latency and amplitude of components found in the derived binaural interaction waveform, that is, binaural interaction components (BIC). BICs were more prevalent in the latency range of ABRs than for MLRs. Click and tonal stimuli were equally effective for deriving ABR-BICs, while tone-bursts were somewhat less effective than clicks for deriving MLR-BICs. Stimulus-response dependencies for ABR and MLR component latencies were apparent in monaural, binaural and binaural interaction waveforms. Normalized amplitudes for BICs showed that low-frequency tone-burst stimuli resulted in the largest values compared to click and high-frequency tonal stimuli. Comparison of these results with published results from adults demonstrated immaturity of binaural interaction in neonates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9112116     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00016-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Physiological Basis and Clinical Use of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Geneviève Laumen; Alexander T Ferber; Georg M Klump; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Test-Retest Reliability of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Alexander T Ferber; Victor Benichoux; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Cortical Representation of Interaural Time Difference Is Impaired by Deafness in Development: Evidence from Children with Early Long-term Access to Sound through Bilateral Cochlear Implants Provided Simultaneously.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Hiroshi Yamazaki; Michael Deighton; Blake Papsin; Karen Gordon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response.

Authors:  Shuman He; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  A Comparison of Two Objective Measures of Binaural Processing: The Interaural Phase Modulation Following Response and the Binaural Interaction Component.

Authors:  Nicholas R Haywood; Jaime A Undurraga; Torsten Marquardt; David McAlpine
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.