Literature DB >> 9111385

In situ lifetime, causes for replacement, and complications of the Provox voice prosthesis.

O Laccourreye1, M Ménard, L Crevier-Buchman, V Couloigner, D Brasnu.   

Abstract

One hundred Provox voice prostheses consecutively inserted in 37 patients and replaced only when phonation was impaired or complications noted were analyzed for in situ lifetime, causes for replacement, and complications. The mean in situ lifetime was 311 days. Actuarial analysis (Kaplan-Meier method) of the in situ lifetime revealed that 65.9%, 23.7%, and 16.4% of the voice prosthesis were still in situ by the 6th, 12th, and 18th postinsertion month. Cause for replacement was salivary leakage through the prosthesis valve, salivary leakage around the prosthesis, deterioration of the prosthesis, and excessive crusting resulting in increased airflow resistance in 33%, 27%, 24%, and 16% of cases, respectively. Complications included granulation tissue formation, cervical cellulitis, necrosis of the tracheoesophageal puncture, tracheostomal stenosis, and swallowing impairment in six, two, one, three, and one patient, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9111385     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199704000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  16 in total

1.  [Perforation of the esophagus with a mediastinal abscess].

Authors:  K Scheuermann; K-W Delank
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Microbial colonization of tracheoesophageal voice prostheses (Provox2) following total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Brigita Tićac; Robert Tićac; Tomislav Rukavina; Palmira Gregorović Kesovija; Dijana Pedisić; Boris Maljevac; Radan Starcević
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  The development and treatment of periprosthetic leakage after prosthetic voice restoration. A literature review and personal experience part I: the development of periprosthetic leakage.

Authors:  Kai J Lorenz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Initial clinical experience with the Provox-Vega® voice prosthesis and the SmartInserter® system].

Authors:  K J Lorenz; H Maier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Analysis of Factors Affecting the Longevity of Voice Prosthesis Following Total Laryngectomy with a Review of Literature.

Authors:  Arvind Krishnamurthy; Suhaildeen Khwajamohiuddin
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-09-06

6.  The management of periprosthetic leakage in the presence of supra-oesophageal reflux after prosthetic voice rehabilitation.

Authors:  Kai J Lorenz; L Grieser; T Ehrhart; H Maier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  [Prosthetic voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Failures and complications after previous radiation therapy].

Authors:  P Kummer; M Chahoud; M Schuster; U Eysholdt; F Rosanowski
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 8.  Postlaryngectomy voice rehabilitation: state of the art at the millennium.

Authors:  Dale H Brown; Frans J M Hilgers; Jonathan C Irish; Alfons J M Balm
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  The impact of radiotherapy and GERD on in situ lifetime of indwelling voice prostheses.

Authors:  Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo; Carlo Marchiori; Alessandro Gava; Maria Cristina Da Mosto
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Factors influencing the longevity and replacement frequency of Provox voice prostheses.

Authors:  Alper Yenigun; Sabri Baki Eren; Murat Haluk Ozkul; Selahattin Tugrul; Aysenur Meric
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.858

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.