Literature DB >> 26668409

Factors influencing the longevity and replacement frequency of Provox voice prostheses.

Alper Yenigun1, Sabri Baki Eren1, Murat Haluk Ozkul2, Selahattin Tugrul1, Aysenur Meric1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the factors that influence the longevity and replacement frequency of Provox voice prostheses following their placement.
METHODS: The medical records of 27 patients who received Provox voice prostheses after total laryngectomy and attended follow-up regularly between 1998 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. The success rate of the Provox voice prostheses (i.e. whether speech was achieved), quality of speech achieved, number and type of complications encountered, frequency of prostheses replacement and reasons for prostheses replacements were evaluated.
RESULTS: All 27 patients were men and their mean age was 63.0 (range 43-78) years. The mean follow-up period was 60.3 (range 1-168) months. Fluent and understandable speech was achieved in 85.0% of the patients. The mean duration before prosthesis replacement had to be performed was 17.1 (range 1-36) months. The most frequent complication was fluid leakage through the prosthesis. There was a strong positive correlation of 77.1% between the longevity of prostheses and postoperative follow-up duration (r = 0.771; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The voice prosthesis is a tool that can be delivered in a practical fashion and replaced easily with no serious complications. It is a means by which speech can be restored, with a high success rate, after total laryngectomy. In the present study, we found that postoperative follow-up duration was the most important factor influencing the longevity of the Provox voice prosthesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Provox; total laryngectomy; tracheoesophageal fistula; voice prosthesis; voice rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26668409      PMCID: PMC4656872          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2015173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  22 in total

Review 1.  Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  R van Weissenbruch; F W Albers
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg       Date:  1992

2.  [The surgery voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy with the Provox system].

Authors:  Robert Bilewicz; Pawel K Burduk; Andrzej Kopczyhiski; Małgorzata Wierzchowska
Journal:  Otolaryngol Pol       Date:  2007

3.  Surgical voice restoration following ablative surgery for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  I Ahmad; B N Kumar; K Radford; J O'Connell; A J Batch
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.469

4.  [Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Voice prostheses or esophageal replacement voice?].

Authors:  I Daniilidis; A Nikolaou; C Markou; A Kotsani
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.057

5.  An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy.

Authors:  M I Singer; E D Blom
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  [Early and late complications after implantation of the Provox 2 voice prosthesis in patients after total laryngectomy].

Authors:  Małgorzata Wierzchowska; Paweł K Burduk
Journal:  Otolaryngol Pol       Date:  2011 May-Jun

7.  Incidence of tracheo-oesophageal fistulas after primary voice rehabilitation with the Provox or the Eska-Herrmann voice prosthesis.

Authors:  W J Issing; S Fuchshuber; M Wehner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  [Analysis of complications after surgical voice and speech rehabilitation in laryngectomized patients. Problems related to implantation and change of voice prosthesis].

Authors:  Stanisław Bień; Sławomir Okła
Journal:  Otolaryngol Pol       Date:  2006

9.  Voice rehabilitation with Provox2 voice prosthesis following total laryngectomy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tomonori Terada; Nobuo Saeki; Kunichika Toh; Nobuhiro Uwa; Kosuke Sagawa; Sadamu Takayasu; Masafumi Sakagami
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 1.863

10.  Primary tracheo-esophageal puncture voice restoration with laryngectomy.

Authors:  M D Morrison; M Ogrady
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1986-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  Analysis of Factors Affecting the Longevity of Voice Prosthesis Following Total Laryngectomy with a Review of Literature.

Authors:  Arvind Krishnamurthy; Suhaildeen Khwajamohiuddin
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-09-06

2.  Postlaryngectomy prosthetic voice rehabilitation outcomes in a consecutive cohort of 232 patients over a 13-year period.

Authors:  Japke F Petersen; Liset Lansaat; Adriana J Timmermans; Vincent van der Noort; Frans J M Hilgers; Michiel W M van den Brekel
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.147

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.