Literature DB >> 9110957

Hummingbird hovering performance in hyperoxic heliox: effects of body mass and sex.

P Chai1, R Harrykissoon, R Dudley.   

Abstract

Owing to their small size and hovering locomotion, hummingbirds are the most aerobically active vertebrate endotherms. Can hyperoxia enhance the flight performance of this highly oxygen-dependent group? Hovering performance of ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) was manipulated non-invasively using hyperoxic but hypodense gas mixtures of sea-level air combined with heliox containing 35% O2. This manipulation sheds light on the interplay among metabolic power input, mechanical power output and aerodynamic force production in limiting flight performance. No significant differences in flight mechanics and oxygen consumption were identified between hyperoxic and normoxic conditions. Thus, at least in the present experimental context, hyperoxia did not change the major metabolic and mechanical parameters; O2 diffusive capacities of the respiratory system were probably not limiting to a significant extent. Compared with hummingbirds in our previous studies, the present experimental birds were heavier, had resultant shorter hover-feeding durations and experienced aerodynamic failure at higher air densities. Because hummingbirds have relatively stable wingbeat frequencies, modulation of power output was attained primarily through variation in stroke amplitude up to near 180 degrees. This result indicates that maximum hovering performance was constrained geometrically and that heavier birds with greater fat loads had less margin for enhancement of power production. Sexual dimorphism in flight adaptation also played a role, with males showing more limited hovering capacities, presumably as a trade-off for increased maneuverability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9110957     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.199.12.2745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

Review 1.  Elastic proteins: biological roles and mechanical properties.

Authors:  John Gosline; Margo Lillie; Emily Carrington; Paul Guerette; Christine Ortlepp; Ken Savage
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Wingbeat kinematics and energetics during weightlifting in hovering hummingbirds across an elevational gradient.

Authors:  Derrick J E Groom; M Cecilia B Toledo; Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 3.  Into rude air: hummingbird flight performance in variable aerial environments.

Authors:  V M Ortega-Jimenez; M Badger; H Wang; R Dudley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Field Flight Dynamics of Hummingbirds during Territory Encroachment and Defense.

Authors:  Katherine M Sholtis; Ryan M Shelton; Tyson L Hedrick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Behavioural adaptations to flight into thin air.

Authors:  Sherub Sherub; Gil Bohrer; Martin Wikelski; Rolf Weinzierl
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Limits to load-lifting performance in a passerine bird: the effects of intraspecific variation in morphological and kinematic parameters.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Yuan Yin; Shiyong Ge; Mo Li; Qian Zhang; Juyong Li; Yuefeng Wu; Dongming Li; Robert Dudley
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.