Literature DB >> 9110194

Metabolic imaging using F18-fluorodeoxyglucose to assess myocardial viability.

J J Bax1, F C Visser, A van Lingen, J H Cornel, P M Fioretti, E E van der Wall.   

Abstract

Over the past 10 years, F18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) has emerged as an important technique in the delineation of myocardial viability. Using this technique it has become possible to predict recovery of ventricular function after revascularization in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Data from long-term (although retrospective) follow-up studies have demonstrated that patients with viable myocardium on FDG PET who do not undergo revascularization are prone to cardiac events, including cardiac death and non-fatal infarction. The same studies have pointed out that patients with viable tissue on FDG PET, who do undergo revascularization, improve substantially in symptoms related to congestive heart failure. To allow FDG imaging in centers without PET equipment, recent studies have evaluated the use of FDG imaging with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and 511 keV collimators. Preliminary data using this alternative approach are promising, but need further confirmation. In this review the experience with FDG imaging (using either PET or SPECT) in the assessment of tissue viability in patients with coronary artery disease will be discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9110194     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005744810876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Card Imaging        ISSN: 0167-9899


  80 in total

1.  Positron emission tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability.

Authors:  H R Schelbert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Prediction of recovery of myocardial dysfunction after revascularization. Comparison of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/thallium-201 SPECT, thallium-201 stress-reinjection SPECT and dobutamine echocardiography.

Authors:  J J Bax; J H Cornel; F C Visser; P M Fioretti; A van Lingen; A E Reijs; E Boersma; G J Teule; C A Visser
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  FDG-SPECT: correlation with FDG-PET.

Authors:  W H Martin; D Delbeke; J A Patton; B Hendrix; Z Weinfeld; I Ohana; R M Kessler; M P Sandler
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Myocardial viability: fluorine-18-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in prediction of wall motion recovery after revascularization.

Authors:  M J Knuuti; M Saraste; P Nuutila; R Härkönen; U Wegelius; A Haapanen; J Bergman; M Haaparanta; T Savunen; L M Voipio-Pulkki
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 5.  Control of energy metabolism of heart muscle.

Authors:  T C Vary; D K Reibel; J R Neely
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 19.318

6.  Comparison of myocardial uptake of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose imaged with PET and SPECT in dyssynergic myocardium.

Authors:  J J Bax; F C Visser; P K Blanksma; M A Veening; E S Tan; T M Willemsen; A van Lingen; G J Teule; W Vaalburg; K I Lie; C A Visser
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Relation of left ventricular perfusion and wall motion with metabolic activity in persistent defects on thallium-201 tomography in healed myocardial infarction.

Authors:  N Tamaki; Y Yonekura; K Yamashita; M Senda; H Saji; T Hashimoto; T Fudo; H Kambara; C Kawai; T Ban
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1988-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Clinical outcome of patients with advanced coronary artery disease after viability studies with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  D Eitzman; Z al-Aouar; H L Kanter; J vom Dahl; M Kirsh; G M Deeb; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Value of metabolic imaging with positron emission tomography for evaluating prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  M F Di Carli; M Davidson; R Little; S Khanna; F V Mody; R C Brunken; J Czernin; S Rokhsar; L W Stevenson; H Laks
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Myocardial glucose metabolism in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients evaluated by FDG-PET.

Authors:  T Ohtake; I Yokoyama; T Watanabe; T Momose; T Serezawa; J Nishikawa; Y Sasaki
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  10 in total

1.  BMIPP compared with PET metabolism.

Authors:  E Tadamura; N Tamaki; T Kudoh; N Hattori; J Konishi
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-02

2.  PET myocardial perfusion and glucose metabolism imaging: Part 2-Guidelines for interpretation and reporting.

Authors:  Heinrich R Schelbert; Robert Beanlands; Frank Bengel; Juhani Knuuti; Marcelo Dicarli; Josef Machac; Randolph Patterson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Fusion imaging: combined visualization of 3D reconstructed coronary artery tree and 3D myocardial scintigraphic image in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  T H Schindler; N Magosaki; M Jeserich; U Oser; T Krause; R Fischer; E Moser; E Nitzsche; M Zehender; H Just; U Solzbach
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-10

4.  A technique for in vivo mapping of myocardial creatine kinase metabolism.

Authors:  Mohammad Haris; Anup Singh; Kejia Cai; Feliks Kogan; Jeremy McGarvey; Catherine Debrosse; Gerald A Zsido; Walter R T Witschey; Kevin Koomalsingh; James J Pilla; Julio A Chirinos; Victor A Ferrari; Joseph H Gorman; Hari Hariharan; Robert C Gorman; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  The amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium predicts long-term survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Christopher Uebleis; Stefan Hellweger; Rüdiger Paul Laubender; Alexander Becker; Hae-Young Sohn; Sebastian Lehner; Alexander Haug; Peter Bartenstein; Paul Cumming; Serge D Van Kriekinge; Piotr J Slomka; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Impairment of myocardial blood flow reserve in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction: effects of ACE-inhibition with perindopril.

Authors:  A F van den Heuvel; P K Blanksma; H M Siebelink; L M van Wijk; F Boomsma; W Vaalburg; H J Crijns; D J van Veldhuisen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Positron emission tomography; viable tool in patients pre-CABG?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; H M Siebelink; A J Scholte; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion and glucose metabolism imaging.

Authors:  Josef Machac; Stephen L Bacharach; Timothy M Bateman; Jeroen J Bax; Robert Beanlands; Frank Bengel; Steven R Bergmann; Richard C Brunken; James Case; Dominique Delbeke; Marcelo F DiCarli; Ernest V Garcia; Richard A Goldstein; Robert J Gropler; Mark Travin; Randolph Patterson; Heinrich R Schelbert
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.872

9.  Assessment of left ventricular function: visual or quantitative?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J H C Reiber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Assessment of left ventricular volumes; reliable by gated SPECT?

Authors:  E E van derWall; A J H A Scholte; H M Siebelink; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.357

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.