Literature DB >> 8147295

Value of metabolic imaging with positron emission tomography for evaluating prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction.

M F Di Carli1, M Davidson, R Little, S Khanna, F V Mody, R C Brunken, J Czernin, S Rokhsar, L W Stevenson, H Laks.   

Abstract

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction have a high but variable annual mortality and some may benefit from myocardial revascularization. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET), and its interrelation with the choice of medical therapy or revascularization for predicting survival and improvement in symptoms of heart failure in patients with CAD and LV dysfunction. Ninety-three consecutive patients with angiographic CAD and a mean LV ejection fraction of 0.25 who underwent cardiac PET studies for assessment of hypoperfused yet viable myocardium ("mismatch pattern") using N-13 ammonia and 18-F deoxyglucose were followed up for an average of 13.6 months. Fifty patients underwent medical treatment and 43 underwent revascularization. The Cox model analysis showed that the extent of mismatch had a negative effect (p = 0.02), whereas revascularization had a positive effect on survival (p = 0.04). The annual survival probability of patients with mismatch receiving medical therapy was lower than of those without mismatch (50 vs 92%, p = 0.007). Patients with mismatch who underwent revascularization had a higher survival rate than those treated medically (88 vs 50%, P = 0.03). The presence of mismatch also predicted improvement in heart failure symptoms after revascularization (p < 0.001). These results suggest that the presence of mismatch in patients with CAD and severe LV dysfunction is associated with poor annual survival with medical therapy. Revascularization in patients with PET mismatch appears to be associated with improved survival and heart failure symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8147295     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90327-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  93 in total

1.  Use of myocardial perfusion imaging to assess viability.

Authors:  M I Travin
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Non-transplant surgery for heart failure.

Authors:  S Westaby
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Proceedings of the 4th Invitational Wintergreen Conference. Wintergreen, Virginia, USA. July 12-14, 1998. Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Assessment of myocardial viability after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Imaging myocardial metabolic remodeling.

Authors:  Robert J Gropler; Rob S B Beanlands; Vasken Dilsizian; E Douglas Lewandowski; Flordeliza S Villanueva; Maria Cecilia Ziadi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Detection of scarred and viable myocardium using a new magnetic resonance imaging technique: blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) MRI.

Authors:  M Egred; A Al-Mohammad; G D Waiter; T W Redpath; S K Semple; M Norton; A Welch; S Walton
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Perfusion-BMIPP mismatch: specific finding or artifact?

Authors:  Koichi Morita; Eriko Tsukamoto; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  The historical and conceptual evolution of radionuclide assessment of myocardial viability.

Authors:  James E Udelson; Robert O Bonow; Vasken Dilsizian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Radionuclide techniques for the assessment of myocardial viability and hibernation.

Authors:  J J Bax; E E van der Wall; M Harbinson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 10.  Integrated imaging of cardiac anatomy, physiology, and viability.

Authors:  James A Arrighi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.