Literature DB >> 9109267

Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.

V C Petropoulos1, W Smith, E Kousvelari.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the retention and release periods of the Nobel Biocare bar and clip (NBC), Nobel Biocare ball (NB), Zest anchor (ZA), Zest magnet (ZM), and Sterngold ERA (SE) attachments on an implant-retained overdenture model. The attachments were tested using two permanently placed Brånemark implants on a test model that was attached to an Instron machine (cross-head speed 50.8 mm/minute). Each attachment had one part embedded in a denture-like housing, and the other part screwed into the implants. Dislodging tensile forces were applied to the housings in two directions simulating function: vertical and oblique. Eight tests were done in two directions with three samples of each attachment. The dislodging forces generated measurements of the peak load, break load, and displacement at peak load and break load. Release periods were calculated using displacements between the peak load and break load and the cross-head speed. Results showed the NBC to be significantly most retentive for the break load when subjected to vertical and oblique forces with mean values and standard deviations of 2104.5 +/- 506.7 g and 1958.1 +/- 165.4 g, respectively. Next most retentive was the SE, followed by the ZA and NB. The ZM was significantly least retentive (127.8 +/- 7.0 g and 143.5 +/- 19.7 g). For the release period, results showed the NBC to have significantly the fastest release period for vertical and oblique forces (1.86 x 10(-3) and 7.35 x 10(-4) minutes). The ZM significantly had the slowest release period for those forces (3.02 x 10(-2) and 2.35 x 10(-2) minutes). The data suggested that the NBC could be selected when a higher degree of retention and fast release period are desired. The next most retentive was the SE; ZM was the least retentive and had the slowest release period.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9109267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  14 in total

1.  Tissue-supported dental implant prosthesis (overdenture): the search for the ideal protocol. A literature review.

Authors:  Domenica Laurito; Luca Lamazza; Michael J Spink; Alberto De Biase
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2012-05-03

2.  Stud attachments for the mandibular implant-retained overdentures: Prosthetic complications. A literature review.

Authors:  Elie E Daou
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2013-02-06

3.  Retentive characteristics of a vinylpolysiloxane overdenture attachment system.

Authors:  Ramona Schweyen; Florian Beuer; Christian Arnold; Jeremias Hey
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparison of three attachments in implant-tissue supported overdentures: an in vitro study.

Authors:  F Tabatabaian; F Alaie; K Seyedan
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2010-09-30

5.  The effect of inter-implant distance on retention and resistance to dislodging forces for mandibular implant-tissue-supported overdentures.

Authors:  Farhad Tabatabaian; Abolfazl Saboury; Zahra Sadat Sobhani; Vicki C Petropoulos
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-09-30

6.  In vitro retention force measurement for three different attachment systems for implant-retained overdenture.

Authors:  Kareem Mohammed Reda; Ibrahim Ramadan El-Torky; Mohamed Nabeel El-Gendy
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

7.  Wear, microleakage and plastic deformation of an implant-supported chair-side bar system.

Authors:  Christian Johannes Mehl; Martin Steiner; Klaus Ludwig; Matthias Kern
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Effect of abutment angulation in the retention and durability of three overdenture attachment systems: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Carlos Aroso; Antonio Sergio Silva; Raul Ustrell; Jose Manuel Mendes; Ana Cristina Braga; Esther Berastegui; Tomas Escuin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  In vitro retention capacity of two overdenture attachment systems: Locator® and Equator®.

Authors:  Nieves Mínguez-Tomás; Jorge Alonso-Pérez-Barquero; Lucía Fernández-Estevan; Ángel Vicente-Escuder; Eduardo J Selva-Otaolaurruchi
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-07-01

10.  Effect of bar cross-section and female housing material on retention of mandibular implant bar overdentures: A comparative in vitro study.

Authors:  Elsayed A Abdel-Khalek; Abdullah M Ibrahim
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.