Literature DB >> 9106588

Performance characteristics of bilevel pressure ventilators: a lung model study.

T Bunburaphong1, H Imanaka, M Nishimura, D Hess, R M Kacmarek.   

Abstract

Bilevel pressure ventilators are being used increasingly to provide noninvasive ventilatory support in the management of obstructive sleep apnea, chronic ventilatory failure, and acute respiratory failure. However, the ability of these ventilators to respond to inspiratory demand without imposing expiratory loads has not been evaluated extensively. We evaluated the performance of nine bilevel pressure ventilators in a lung model, as compared with the Nellcor Puritan-Bennett 7200ae adult critical care ventilator. All ventilators were set to provide pressure support ventilation (PSV) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at a rate of 10 breaths/min with an inspiratory time of 1.0 s. Simulated pleural pressure, airway pressure, and flow at airway opening were continuously monitored. We studied the effects of three PSV levels (5, 10, and 15 cm H2O) with 5 cm H2O PEEP at two lung compliances (50 and 80 mL/cm H2O) and four peak inspiratory flow demands (20, 40, 60, and 80 L/min) on seven dependent variables: inspiratory delay time (D-I), inspiratory trigger pressure (P-I), inspiratory area percent (Area I%), expiratory delay time (D-E), supraplateau expiratory pressure change (P-E), expiratory area (Area E), and ventilator peak flow (VPF). Most ventilators performed as well as or significantly (p<0.05) better than the 7200ae in all studied variables. Compliance did not significantly affect ventilator performance. Increasing inspiratory flow demand significantly (p<0.05) increased D-I, P-I, P-E, and VPF and decreased Area I% with most ventilators. As ventilatory demand increased, D-E and Area E significantly (p<0.05) changed. With some units, D-E and Area E increased, while with others they decreased. Most bilevel pressure ventilators evaluated were able to respond to high ventilatory demands and outperformed the Nellcor Puritan-Bennett 7200ae ventilator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9106588     DOI: 10.1378/chest.111.4.1050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  9 in total

1.  Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Bench studies evaluating devices for non-invasive ventilation: critical analysis and future perspectives.

Authors:  Carlo Olivieri; Roberta Costa; Giorgio Conti; Paolo Navalesi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Intermediate respiratory intensive care units in Europe: a European perspective.

Authors:  S Nava; M Confalonieri; C Rampulla
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  A bench study of intensive-care-unit ventilators: new versus old and turbine-based versus compressed gas-based ventilators.

Authors:  Arnaud W Thille; Aissam Lyazidi; Jean-Christophe M Richard; Fabrice Galia; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Trigger performance of mid-level ICU mechanical ventilators during assisted ventilation: a bench study.

Authors:  Juliana C Ferreira; Daniel W Chipman; Robert M Kacmarek
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Performance characteristics of seven bilevel mechanical ventilators in pressure-support mode with different cycling criteria: a comparative bench study.

Authors:  Yuqing Chen; Kewen Cheng; Xin Zhou
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-01-26

7.  Low-cost, easy-to-build noninvasive pressure support ventilator for under-resourced regions: open source hardware description, performance and feasibility testing.

Authors:  Onintza Garmendia; Miguel A Rodríguez-Lazaro; Jorge Otero; Phuong Phan; Alexandrina Stoyanova; Anh Tuan Dinh-Xuan; David Gozal; Daniel Navajas; Josep M Montserrat; Ramon Farré
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 16.671

8.  Comparison of Inspiratory Effort, Workload and Cycling Synchronization Between Non-Invasive Proportional-Assist Ventilation and Pressure-Support Ventilation Using Different Models of Respiratory Mechanics.

Authors:  Yuqing Chen; Yueyang Yuan; Hai Zhang; Feng Li
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-11-28

9.  Effectiveness of Inspiratory Termination Synchrony with Automatic Cycling During Noninvasive Pressure Support Ventilation.

Authors:  Yuqing Chen; Kewen Cheng; Xin Zhou
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-05-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.