Literature DB >> 9106418

ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING: A Synoptic Approach for Assessing CumulativeImpacts to Wetlands

.   

Abstract

/ The US Environmental Protection Agency's Wetlands ResearchProgram has developed the synoptic approach as a proposed method forassessing cumulative impacts to wetlands by providing both a general and acomprehensive view of the environment. It can also be applied more broadly toregional prioritization of environmental issues. The synoptic approach is aframework for making comparisons between landscape subunits, such aswatersheds, ecoregions, or counties, thereby allowing cumulative impacts tobe considered in management decisions. Because there is a lack of tools thatcan be used to address cumulative impacts within regulatory constraints, thesynoptic approach was designed as a method that could make use of availableinformation and best professional judgement. Thus, the approach is acompromise between the need for rigorous results and the need for timelyinformation. It is appropriate for decision making when quantitative,accurate information is not available; the cost of improving existinginformation or obtaining better information is high; the cost of a wronganswer is low; there is a high demand for the information; and the situationcalls for setting priorities between multiple decisions versus optimizing fora single decision. The synoptic approach should be useful for resourcemanagers because an assessment is timely; it can be completed within one totwo years at relatively low cost, tested, and improved over time. Anassessment can also be customized to specific needs, and the results arepresented in mapped format. However, the utility of a synoptic assessmentdepends on how well knowledge of the environment is incorporated into theassessment, relevant to particular management questions.KEY WORDS: Cumulative impact assessment; Landscape ecology; Regionalprioritization

Year:  1997        PMID: 9106418     DOI: 10.1007/s002679900042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  JSEM: a framework for identifying and evaluating indicators.

Authors:  J B Hyman; S G Leibowitz
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Multiscale analysis of restoration priorities for marine shoreline planning.

Authors:  Heida L Diefenderfer; Kathryn L Sobocinski; Ronald M Thom; Christopher W May; Amy B Borde; Susan L Southard; John Vavrinec; Nichole K Sather
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Evaluation of potential habitat with an integrated analysis of a spatial conservation strategy for David's deer, Elaphurus davidians.

Authors:  S B Fang; X S Zhang; X B Jia; S Q An; C F Zhou; C Xu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Prioritizing watersheds for conservation actions in the southeastern coastal plain ecoregion.

Authors:  Taeil Jang; George Vellidis; Lyubov A Kurkalova; Jan Boll; Jeffrey B Hyman
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Model for prioritizing best management practice implementation: sediment load reduction.

Authors:  Taeil Jang; George Vellidis; Jeffrey B Hyman; Erin Brooks; Lyubov A Kurkalova; Jan Boll; Jaepil Cho
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Catchment-wide wetland assessment and prioritization using the multi-criteria decision-making method TOPSIS.

Authors:  Canran Liu; Paul Frazier; Lalit Kumar; Catherine Macgregor; Nigel Blake
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.644

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.