Literature DB >> 9105859

Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease.

D Kalogirou1, G Antoniou, P Karakitsos, D Botsis, O Kalogirou, L Giannikos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the interpretability and significance of the traditional factors used to predict residual dysplasia in hysterectomy specimens after loop conization.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Loop electrosurgical cervical conization was performed on 372 patients. Ninety three women had a hysterectomy within 6 months of the loop conization. Residual disease was defined as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer in the hysterectomy specimen.
RESULTS: Of the 93 patients having a subsequent hysterectomy, 36 (38.7%) has residual disease in their hysterectomy specimen. The mean age of the patients with residual disease in the post loop conization hysterectomy specimen was 42.22. The mean age of those free of residual disease was 29.42. By multivariate analysis, dysplasia involving the ectocervical margin (p = 0.34) and the endocervical margin (p = 0.35) was not predictive of disease in the hysterectomy specimens. Endocervical curettage (p = 0.005), glandular involvement (p = 0.01), loop conization pathology findings (p < 0.05) and cytological examination (p < 0.001) were predictive of residual dysplasia.
CONCLUSIONS: Cytological reports, increasing age, severity of disease, gland involvement and endocervical curettage were the only factors that accurately predicted residual dysplasia. The presence or absence of dysplasia in the loop conization, ectocervical margin and endocervical margin was not predictive of residual dysplasia in post loop conization hysterectomy specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9105859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol        ISSN: 0392-2936            Impact factor:   0.196


  8 in total

1.  Vaginal cytology following primary hysterectomy for cervical cancer: is it useful?

Authors:  C Coughlan; F McAuliffe; N Bermingham; N Gleeson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Clinical Outcomes Associated with Endocervical Glandular Involvement in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia III.

Authors:  Nae Ry Kim; Zee Hae Baek; A Jin Lee; Eun Jung Yang; Yung-Taek Ouh; Mi Kyung Kim; Seung-Hyuk Shim; Sun Joo Lee; Tae Jin Kim; Kyeong A So
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  The effectiveness of cold-knife conization (CKC) for post-menopausal women with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Xiao Li; Meihua Liu; Yurou Ji; Pengpeng Qu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Cytohistological correlation of endocervical gland involvement with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  G Kir; Mh Karabulut; Ms Yilmaz; Cs Topal; A Gocmen
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  A human papillomavirus (HPV)-16 or HPV-18 genotype is a reliable predictor of residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy following a loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3.

Authors:  Woo Dae Kang; U Chul Ju; Seok Mo Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Factors that influence persistence or recurrence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with positive margins after the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Menghan Zhu; Yuan He; Jan Pa Baak; Xianrong Zhou; Yuqing Qu; Long Sui; Weiwei Feng; Qing Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  The risk factors of residual lesions and recurrence of the high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) patients with positive-margin after conization.

Authors:  Jun-Yu Chen; Zhi-Ling Wang; Zhao-Yang Wang; Xing-Sheng Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions.

Authors:  Beth Hamilton; Stephanie N McClellan; Mark A Rettenmaier; Bram H Goldstein
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.