Literature DB >> 9105437

Enhancement of expressive language in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants.

R T Miyamoto1, M A Svirsky, A M Robbins.   

Abstract

Expressive language skills were assessed in two groups of prelingually-deafened children using the Reynell Developmental Language Scales (RDLS). Results from a group of 89 unimplanted subjects provided cross-sectional data which suggested that profoundly deaf children without implants, on average, could only be expected to make 5 months of expressive language growth in one year. Twenty-three children who received cochlear implants made up the second group of subjects and were administered the RDLS at three intervals: preimplant, 6-, and 12-months postimplant. The scores obtained at the post-implant intervals were then compared to scores that would be predicted on the basis of maturation alone, without the implant (these predictions were formulated based on the data obtained from the unimplanted subjects). At the 12-month postimplant interval, the observed mean language score was significantly higher than the predicted score. Although the mean group data were extremely encouraging, wide inter- subject variability was observed. Although the implant subjects, as a group, were substantially delayed compared with their normal hearing peers, their rate of language growth was found to match that of hearing peers, following implantation. Thus, the gap between chronological age and language age, which normally widens over time in deaf children, remained constant. Preliminary analyses over the first 2.5 years post-implant are consistent with this trend. These results suggest that early implantation (before age 3) might be beneficial to profoundly deaf children because the language delays at the time of implantation would be much smaller.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9105437     DOI: 10.3109/00016489709117758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  11 in total

1.  Cognitive factors and cochlear implants: some thoughts on perception, learning, and memory in speech perception.

Authors:  D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids.

Authors:  J B Tomblin; L Spencer; S Flock; R Tyler; B Gantz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  The ear is connected to the brain: some new directions in the study of children with cochlear implants at Indiana University.

Authors:  Derek M Houston; Jessica Beer; Tonya R Bergeson; Steven B Chin; David B Pisoni; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Reading Skills in Children with Multichannel Cochlear-lmplant Experience.

Authors:  Linda Spencer; J Bruce Tomblin; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Volta Rev       Date:  1997

6.  Vowel space characteristics of speech directed to children with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wieland; Evamarie B Burnham; Maria Kondaurova; Tonya R Bergeson; Laura C Dilley
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Infant-Directed Speech Enhances Attention to Speech in Deaf Infants With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Tonya R Bergeson; Derek M Houston
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Attention to speech and spoken language development in deaf children with cochlear implants: a 10-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Carissa L Shafto; Derek M Houston
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2018-05-15

9.  An Eye Tracking Study on the Perception and Comprehension of Unimodal and Bimodal Linguistic Inputs by Deaf Adolescents.

Authors:  Eliana Mastrantuono; David Saldaña; Isabel R Rodríguez-Ortiz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-21

10.  Diverse Linguistic Development in Prelingually Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Pia De Stefano; Francesco Pisani; Giuseppe Cossu
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.