P M Gronet1, C F Driscoll, S O Hondrum. 1. Advanced Education Program In Prosthodontics, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C., USA.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Studies have suggested that coating a temporary soft denture liner with a semiset methyl methacrylate resin extends the period of resiliency of the liner. PURPOSE: This study determined whether coating three temporary soft denture liners with two different denture surface sealants, followed by thermocycling, affected the resiliency of the liners. MATERIAL AND METHODS: thirty 20 x 12.5 mm cylindrical samples each of Lynal, Coe Soft, and Visco-Gel soft lining materials were prepared and divided into three groups of 10 uncoated samples, 10 Palaseal-coated samples, and 10 mono-poly coated samples. Samples were thermocycled from 5 degrees C to 45 degrees C for 500 cycles and then compressed 10 mm on an Instron universal testing machine. Resiliency was determined by measuring the energy absorbed by the soft liners when stressed to a specific yield point. RESULTS: Two-way ANOVA indicated a significant difference among materials (p = 0.0001) and among treatments (p = 0.0001). One-way ANOVA of each material group revealed a significant difference among Lynal groups (p = 0.0001) and a significant difference among Visco-Gel groups (p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Surface-coating Lynal samples with Palaseal or mono-poly and Visco-Gel samples with Palaseal significantly increased the resiliency of these samples in the laboratory when compared with uncoated samples.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Studies have suggested that coating a temporary soft denture liner with a semiset methyl methacrylate resin extends the period of resiliency of the liner. PURPOSE: This study determined whether coating three temporary soft denture liners with two different denture surface sealants, followed by thermocycling, affected the resiliency of the liners. MATERIAL AND METHODS: thirty 20 x 12.5 mm cylindrical samples each of Lynal, Coe Soft, and Visco-Gel soft lining materials were prepared and divided into three groups of 10 uncoated samples, 10 Palaseal-coated samples, and 10 mono-poly coated samples. Samples were thermocycled from 5 degrees C to 45 degrees C for 500 cycles and then compressed 10 mm on an Instron universal testing machine. Resiliency was determined by measuring the energy absorbed by the soft liners when stressed to a specific yield point. RESULTS: Two-way ANOVA indicated a significant difference among materials (p = 0.0001) and among treatments (p = 0.0001). One-way ANOVA of each material group revealed a significant difference among Lynal groups (p = 0.0001) and a significant difference among Visco-Gel groups (p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Surface-coating Lynal samples with Palaseal or mono-poly and Visco-Gel samples with Palaseal significantly increased the resiliency of these samples in the laboratory when compared with uncoated samples.