Literature DB >> 9101075

Evidence of gender bias in patients undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy.

A H Herold1, A I Riker, E A Warner, L J Woodard, H J Brownlee, D Pencev, R J Oldenski, P G Brady.   

Abstract

Some studies have revealed gender bias against women in various aspects of medical care. There is no substantial evidence of gender bias in patients undergoing cancer evaluations, specifically colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis of colorectal complaints. This study was designed to examine the role of gender bias related to patients undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy. At the University of South Florida, we conducted a retrospective study of 1910 patients at three distinct flexible sigmoidoscopy clinics over several years, through 1992. The proportions of male and female patients who underwent the procedure for indications of either screening for colorectal cancer or the diagnosis of colorectal complaints were determined. These proportions were compared with the respective male and female patient proportion from the total number of currently active patients at each site who were eligible to have the procedure for an appropriate indication. At all three sites, a significantly smaller proportion of women (p < 0.01) underwent the procedure than expected. This was true for both screening and diagnostic indications. Conversely, at all sites significantly more men (p < 0.01) underwent the procedure for both indications. The results of this study suggest gender bias against women for patients undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy for both screening and diagnosis. This bias may adversely affect the lethality of colorectal cancer in women. It is important to determine if such biases are influenced by the physician's recommendation or mainly due to patient attitudes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9101075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev        ISSN: 0361-090X


  5 in total

1.  Patients' perceptions of physicians' recommendations for comfort care differ by patient age and gender.

Authors:  M F Johnson; M Lin; S Mangalik; D J Murphy; A M Kramer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening barriers and information needs.

Authors:  Greta Friedemann-Sánchez; Joan M Griffin; Melissa R Partin
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Gender perspective in medicine: a vital part of medical scientific rationality. A useful model for comprehending structures and hierarchies within medical science.

Authors:  Gunilla Risberg; Katarina Hamberg; Eva E Johansson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Gender gap in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Stefanie T Jost; Lena Strobel; Alexandra Rizos; Philipp A Loehrer; Keyoumars Ashkan; Julian Evans; Franz Rosenkranz; Michael T Barbe; Gereon R Fink; Jeremy Franklin; Anna Sauerbier; Christopher Nimsky; Afsar Sattari; K Ray Chaudhuri; Angelo Antonini; Lars Timmermann; Pablo Martinez-Martin; Monty Silverdale; Elke Kalbe; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; Haidar S Dafsari
Journal:  NPJ Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2022-04-20

5.  A theoretical model for analysing gender bias in medicine.

Authors:  Gunilla Risberg; Eva E Johansson; Katarina Hamberg
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2009-08-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.