S Krag1, K Thim, L Corydon. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Vejle Hospital, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the mechanical quality of a capsulotomy opening performed by diathermy with that made by capsulorhexis (tearing). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Vejle Hospital, Denmark. METHODS: This study included 12 pairs of human cadaver eyes and 20 pairs of pig eyes. One in each pair was randomly selected for one capsulotomy technique. The capsulotomy edge was stretched in a materials testing machine until break; force and elongation values were continuously recorded. RESULTS: In humans, the extensibility of the diathermic capsulotomy edge was approximately half that of the capsulorhexis edge (mean 38% +/- 4 [SD] versus 68% +/- 6), and the force required to break the edge was reduced by a factor of five (26 +/- 8 mN versus 134 +/- 36 mN). CONCLUSION: The mechanical quality of the diathermic capsulotomy edge is significantly less than that of the capsulorhexis edge, which indicates that the diathermic capsulotomy edge would withstand less surgical manipulation.
PURPOSE: To compare the mechanical quality of a capsulotomy opening performed by diathermy with that made by capsulorhexis (tearing). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Vejle Hospital, Denmark. METHODS: This study included 12 pairs of human cadaver eyes and 20 pairs of pig eyes. One in each pair was randomly selected for one capsulotomy technique. The capsulotomy edge was stretched in a materials testing machine until break; force and elongation values were continuously recorded. RESULTS: In humans, the extensibility of the diathermic capsulotomy edge was approximately half that of the capsulorhexis edge (mean 38% +/- 4 [SD] versus 68% +/- 6), and the force required to break the edge was reduced by a factor of five (26 +/- 8 mN versus 134 +/- 36 mN). CONCLUSION: The mechanical quality of the diathermic capsulotomy edge is significantly less than that of the capsulorhexis edge, which indicates that the diathermic capsulotomy edge would withstand less surgical manipulation.
Authors: Siegfried G Priglinger; Daniel Palanker; Claudia S Alge; Thomas C Kreutzer; Christos Haritoglou; Martin Grueterich; Anselm Kampik Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2007-01-17 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Daniel Palanker; Hiroyuki Nomoto; Philip Huie; Alexander Vankov; David F Chang Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.351