Literature DB >> 9095680

Perceptual dimensional constraints in response selection processes.

A Cohen1, R Shoup.   

Abstract

Most processing stages theorists assume that response selection processes are largely autonomous from earlier perceptual analysis of information. We report findings that challenge this assumption and suggest that a much more complex interaction exists between perception and action. Specifically our study demonstrates that the initial analysis of visual objects into features from different dimensions strongly constrains postperceptual processes of response selection. When a target that is associated with a response on the basis of one dimension is presented simultaneously with flankers that are associated with a response on the basis of another dimension, the response to the target is not affected by the identity of the flankers. These findings hold under a variety of conditions and appear to be specific to perceptual dimensions. When both target and flankers are associated with a response on the basis of the same dimension, the response to the target is affected by the identity of the flankers even when the target and flankers are perceptually dissimilar or belong to different semantic categories (digits and letters). We propose a model of response selection that can account for these findings. The model assumes that initial response selection processes for simple features are performed within dimensional modules and suggests a specific mediating role for spatial attention. We argue that this model is compatible with several other lines of research.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9095680     DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  22 in total

1.  Event-related brain potentials and cognitive processes related to perceptual-motor information transmission.

Authors:  Bruno Kopp; Karl Wessel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Location specificity in response selection processes for visual stimuli.

Authors:  Hagit Magen; Asher Cohen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

3.  The effect of novel distractors on performance in focused attention tasks: a cognitive-psychophysiological approach.

Authors:  Nurit Gronau; Einat Sequerra; Asher Cohen; Gershon Ben-Shakhar
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

4.  Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen Flusberg; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Using a filtering task to measure the spatial extent of selective attention.

Authors:  John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Attentional control of the creation and retrieval of stimulus-response bindings.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel; Jiska Memelink; Sharon Zmigrod; Lorenza S Colzato
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-07-25

7.  Strategic capacity sharing between two tasks: evidence from tasks with the same and with different task sets.

Authors:  Carola Lehle; Ronald Hübner
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-08

8.  Involuntary strategy-dependent dual task performance.

Authors:  Moran Israel; Asher Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-07

9.  Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Top-down versus bottom-up: when instructions overcome automatic retrieval.

Authors:  Florian Waszak; Roland Pfister; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.