Literature DB >> 9095420

Wide variation in single, daily-dose aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics in patients with burn injuries.

L L Hoey1, S J Tschida, J C Rotschafer, D R Guay, K Vance-Bryan.   

Abstract

Five to seven mg/kg single, daily-dose aminoglycoside regimens have been recently advocated as effective alternatives to traditional aminoglycoside regimens. The rationale for single, daily-dose aminoglycoside therapy is to produce an optimal ratio between aminoglycoside peak concentrations (Cmax) and pathogen minimal inhibitory concentration to maximize bacterial killing and to produce an aminoglycoside-free period during the 24-hour dosing interval. Single, daily-dose aminoglycoside therapy has not been recommended to date for use in the population of patients with burn injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude and variability of aminoglycoside Cmax and the duration of the aminoglycoside-free period after simulated single, daily-dose regimens in patients with burn injuries. Fifty-two patients receiving gentamicin or tobramycin in the burn unit were studied retrospectively to determine the individualized pharmacokinetic parameters and the simulated Cmax and 24-hour after the dose trough minimum concentrations for 5 and 7 mg/kg single, daily-dose aminoglycoside regimens. Patients were only included in the final analysis if they had been treated for burn wound infections and exhibited a calculated creatinine clearance exceeding 60 ml/min (N = 40). Mean [percentage coefficient of variation] Cmax/minimum concentrations were 15.4[30.5]/0.03[200.0] and 21.6[30.6]/0.04[200.0] mg/L for 5 and 7 mg/kg daily doses, respectively. The mean coefficient of variation time to reach an extrapolated concentration of 0.1 mg/L was 15.9[30.8] hours and 17.0[30.6] hours for the 5 and 7 mg/kg daily doses, respectively. Substantial variability in aminoglycoside Cmax and duration of the aminoglycoside-free period was observed. These data suggest that many patients with burn injuries are not candidates for single, daily-dose aminoglycoside therapy because of restrictive creatinine clearance criteria and pronounced variability in length of the aminoglycoside-free interval. If single, daily-dose aminoglycoside therapy is to be used in this patient population, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to screen for appropriate candidates and to optimize Cmax and minimal inhibitory concentration ratios and duration of the aminoglycoside-free interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9095420     DOI: 10.1097/00004630-199703000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil        ISSN: 0273-8481


  5 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of cefepime in patients with thermal burn injury.

Authors:  C R Bonapace; R L White; L V Friedrich; E D Norcross; J A Bosso
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients: a review of pathophysiological conditions responsible for altered disposition and pharmacokinetic variability.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin in the elderly.

Authors:  E Triggs; B Charles
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  The therapeutic monitoring of antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  E J Begg; M L Barclay; C J Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Influence of burns on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs used in the care of burn patients.

Authors:  Benoit Blanchet; Vincent Jullien; Christophe Vinsonneau; Michel Tod
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.