Literature DB >> 9094272

Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. A randomized clinical trial.

G Kazemier1, G R de Zeeuw, J F Lange, W C Hop, H J Bonjer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A randomized clinical trial was performed to compare open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA).
METHODS: 201 patients with similar characteristics of appendicitis were randomized to either OA or LA. Operative time and technique, reintroduction of diet, postoperative pain, use of analgesia, hospital stay, and complications were documented.
RESULTS: 104 patients were allocated to the OA group and 97 to the LA group. Postoperative pain was significantly less in the LA group on the 1st (p < 0.001) and 2nd (p < 0.001) postoperative day, resulting in less use of analgesics on both days (p < 0.001). Restoration of diet was similar in both groups. Mean operative time was longer in the LA group: 61 vs 41 min (p < 0.001). Postoperative complications did not differ in either group, except for wound infections (six OA group vs zero LA group, p < 0.05). Mean hospital stay was similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: LA results in less postoperative pain and fewer wound infections. The laparoscopic procedure is technically more demanding to perform, resulting in longer operative time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9094272     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

Review 1.  The incidence and risk factors of post-laparotomy adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Galinos Barmparas; Bernardino C Branco; Beat Schnüriger; Lydia Lam; Kenji Inaba; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Cost perspectives of laparoscopic and open appendectomy.

Authors:  D E Moore; T Speroff; E Grogan; B Poulose; M D Holzman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling?

Authors:  G Kazemier; K H in't Hof; S Saad; H J Bonjer; S Sauerland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review.

Authors:  M Kapischke; A Caliebe; J Tepel; T Schulz; J Hedderich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly.

Authors:  Y-C Wang; H-R Yang; P-K Chung; L-B Jeng; R-J Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Videolaparoscopic appendectomy: the current outlook.

Authors:  G C Roviaro; C Vergani; F Varoli; M Francese; R Caminiti; M Maciocco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The preoperative serum C-reactive protein level is a useful predictor of surgical site infections in patients undergoing appendectomy.

Authors:  Takayuki Shimizu; Mitsuru Ishizuka; Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 9.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiaohang Li; Jialin Zhang; Lixuan Sang; Wenliang Zhang; Zhiqiang Chu; Xin Li; Yongfeng Liu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy is associated with a lower complication rate even during the introductory phase.

Authors:  Matthias Kapischke; Juergen Tepel; Klaus Bley
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.