Literature DB >> 9094082

What is the optimum phased array coil design for cardiac and torso magnetic resonance?

P A Bottomley1, C H Lugo Olivieri, R Giaquinto.   

Abstract

To determine the optimum configuration of a phased array MR coil system for human cardiac applications, the sensitivity of 10 flexible array designs operating under ideal conditions was calculated at 13 points circling the myocardium of a model torso whose geometry was determined from healthy volunteers. The array geometries that were evaluated included continuous strips of 2, 4, 6, and 10 circular coils of diameter equal to half the torso thickness wrapped laterally around the torso, 2 pairs of coils located on the left side of the chest and back, clusters of 3 coils in 2 orientations, clusters of 4 and 6 coils, and a hybrid cross of 6 coils. The 4-, 6-, and 10-coil strip arrays out-performed the other designs for a given number of coils, yielding average theoretical sensitivity improvements of 45%, 53%, and 55% relative to a single flexible coil positioned at the point closest to the anterior myocardium, compared with about 30% for 4- and 6-coil clusters and the 2-pair geometry (P < 0.02). A flexible 4-coil strip array was constructed for a clinical 1.5 T scanner with 15-cm diameter circular surface coils on flexible circuit board. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of this coil at the 13 cardiac locations was measured in 15 normal volunteers and compared with the SNR measured in images acquired with standard commercial MR coils: a body coil, a flexible torso array, a general purpose flexible coil, and, in 4 subjects, a dual array coil. In the prone orientation, the average myocardial SNR improvement of the 4-coil strip array was 650% relative to the whole body coil, compared with 310-340% for the other commercial coils (P < 0.00005). The twofold advantage over the commercial coils persisted in supine studies (P < 0.00005, n = 5). Thus, flexible circumferential phased arrays of strips of surface coils of diameter comparable with the depth of the heart generally out-perform many other standard geometries for a given number of coils, and can yield dramatically improved SNR over coils available for general use in the torso.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9094082     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910370419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  10 in total

1.  An analytical SMASH procedure (ASP) for sensitivity-encoded MRI.

Authors:  R F Lee; C R Westgate; R G Weiss; P A Bottomley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Cardiovascular MRI probes for the outside in and for the inside out.

Authors:  P A Bottomley; E Atalar; R F Lee; K A Shunk; A Lardo
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Investigation of complex phased array coil designs for cardiac imaging.

Authors:  M Nittka; A Haase
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  32-element receiver-coil array for cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Christopher J Hardy; Harvey E Cline; Randy O Giaquinto; Thoralf Niendorf; Aaron K Grant; Daniel K Sodickson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Optimizing the intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio of MRI strip detectors.

Authors:  Ananda Kumar; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  4 T Actively detuneable double-tuned 1H/31P head volume coil and four-channel 31P phased array for human brain spectroscopy.

Authors:  N I Avdievich; H P Hetherington
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Optimization of a transmit/receive surface coil for squirrel monkey spinal cord imaging.

Authors:  Ming Lu; Feng Wang; Li Min Chen; John C Gore; Xinqiang Yan
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Methodological advances in cardiac 31P-MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  M von Kienlin
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 9.  Cardiac 1H-MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  M von Kienlin
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.533

10.  Inter-observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion reserve quantification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3 Tesla in comparison to quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  Katharina Ikuye; Dominik Buckert; Lisa Schaaf; Thomas Walcher; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Peter Bernhardt
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.364

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.