Literature DB >> 9093100

Why general practitioners and consultants change their clinical practice: a critical incident study.

L A Allery1, P A Owen, M R Robling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the complete range of factors which doctors recognise as changing their clinical practice and provide a measure of how often education is involved in change.
DESIGN: Interviews using the critical incident technique.
SETTING: Primary and secondary care.
SUBJECTS: Random sample of 50 general practitioners and 50 consultants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Categories of reasons for change in clinical practice.
RESULTS: Doctors described 361 changes in clinical practice, with an average of 3.0 reasons per change. The three most frequently mentioned reasons were organisational factors, education, and contact with professionals, together accounting for 47.9% of the total number of reasons for change. Education accounted for one sixth (16.9%) of the reasons for change and was involved in one third (37.1%) of the changes. Education was seldom mentioned as a reason for change in referral practice but was more often mentioned in management and prescribing changes. Consultants were influenced by medical journals and scientific conferences, while general practitioners were more influenced by medical newspapers and postgraduate meetings.
CONCLUSIONS: Education is involved in about a third of changes in clinical practice. The wide range of other factors affecting changes in practice need to be taken into account in providing and evaluating education. The role of education in the numerous changes in clinical practice that currently have no educational component should also be considered.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9093100      PMCID: PMC2126250          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.314.7084.870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  27 in total

Review 1.  General practitioners' continuing education: a review of policies, strategies and effectiveness, and their implications for the future.

Authors:  F Smith; A Singleton; S Hilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Does continuing medical education in general practice make a difference?

Authors:  P Cantillon; R Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-08

3.  Prescribing new drugs: qualitative study of influences on consultants and general practitioners.

Authors:  M I Jones; S M Greenfield; C P Bradley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-18

4.  Changing physician behaviour.

Authors:  H Bauchner; L Simpson; J Chessare
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Doctors perceptions of the influences on their prescribing: a comparison of general practitioners based in rural and urban Australia.

Authors:  Christopher Cutts; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  A qualitative study to explore influences on general practitioners' decisions to prescribe new drugs.

Authors:  Ann Jacoby; Monica Smith; Martin Eccles
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Explanatory model of prescribing behavior in prescription of statins in family practice.

Authors:  Ksenija Tusek-Bunc; Janko Kersnik; Marija Petek-Ster; Davorina Petek; Zalika Klemenc-Ketis
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Impact of high dose statin trials on hospital prescribers.

Authors:  Thomas I Barron; Kathleen Bennett; John Feely
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Use of critical incident reports in medical education. A perspective.

Authors:  William T Branch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  From trial data to practical knowledge: qualitative study of how general practitioners have accessed and used evidence about statin drugs in their management of hypercholesterolaemia.

Authors:  K Fairhurst; G Huby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.