Christopher Cutts1, Susan E Tett. 1. School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. christopher@qrmsa.com.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare and contrast the influences on prescribing perceived by general practitioners in an urban area of Queensland, Australia, to those perceived by general practitioners in rural Queensland. METHOD: An investigation was undertaken with a group of general practitioners in urban and rural locations of Australia. A self-administered questionnaire requested the doctors' demographic details and their opinions on statements about prescribing. They also reported their prescribing of six recently marketed drugs. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-two general practitioners from rural areas of Queensland (55% of the eligible population of these doctors) and one hundred and thirty-seven from the urban area (54% response) returned the surveys. The urban group were older and had more experience as general practitioners. Similarities and differences were detected between the two groups. The urban group considered that continuing medical education had a lesser influence on their prescribing than the rural group. The rural general practitioners were more likely than the urban doctors to agree that their information needs on prescribing were not being met in their practice, that their practice location had an effect on their prescribing (and also an effect on their prescribing of new drugs) as well as the remoteness of the patient's address having an effect. The rural doctors agreed more than the urban doctors that they try to avoid drugs requiring a significant amount of monitoring, reinforced by their agreement that they would be more likely to prescribe a newly marketed drug requiring less monitoring. When relating to whether the doctors in the two groups had reported initiating a supply of specific newly marketed drugs, independent of a specialist, rural general practitioners had initiated fewer of these selected new medicines. CONCLUSION: This study has highlighted some of the differences in perceptions of doctors on the influences on prescribing in rural relative to urban areas of Australia. An understanding of these perceptions will allow targeting and development of location-relevant prescribing interventions and messages.
OBJECTIVES: To compare and contrast the influences on prescribing perceived by general practitioners in an urban area of Queensland, Australia, to those perceived by general practitioners in rural Queensland. METHOD: An investigation was undertaken with a group of general practitioners in urban and rural locations of Australia. A self-administered questionnaire requested the doctors' demographic details and their opinions on statements about prescribing. They also reported their prescribing of six recently marketed drugs. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-two general practitioners from rural areas of Queensland (55% of the eligible population of these doctors) and one hundred and thirty-seven from the urban area (54% response) returned the surveys. The urban group were older and had more experience as general practitioners. Similarities and differences were detected between the two groups. The urban group considered that continuing medical education had a lesser influence on their prescribing than the rural group. The rural general practitioners were more likely than the urban doctors to agree that their information needs on prescribing were not being met in their practice, that their practice location had an effect on their prescribing (and also an effect on their prescribing of new drugs) as well as the remoteness of the patient's address having an effect. The rural doctors agreed more than the urban doctors that they try to avoid drugs requiring a significant amount of monitoring, reinforced by their agreement that they would be more likely to prescribe a newly marketed drug requiring less monitoring. When relating to whether the doctors in the two groups had reported initiating a supply of specific newly marketed drugs, independent of a specialist, rural general practitioners had initiated fewer of these selected new medicines. CONCLUSION: This study has highlighted some of the differences in perceptions of doctors on the influences on prescribing in rural relative to urban areas of Australia. An understanding of these perceptions will allow targeting and development of location-relevant prescribing interventions and messages.