Literature DB >> 9091940

Does double gloving protect surgical staff from skin contamination during plastic surgery?

S Marín-Bertolín1, R González-Martínez, C N Giménez, P Marquina Vila, J Amorrortu-Velayos.   

Abstract

In a randomized study, the effectiveness of double gloving in maintaining an intact barrier between the patient and the hands of the surgical staff during plastic surgery operations was tested. For 2 months, the surgical staff of a plastic surgery unit randomly wore single or double gloves during all elective surgical procedures. At the end of the operations, the gloves were tested by the water filling test. A total of 1092 gloves were examined. Twelve accidental injuries were noticed during the operations, and 67 unnoticed perforations occurred. The data suggest that the risk of perforation and exposure increases with the length and complexity of the procedures. It was concluded that double gloving is effective in plastic surgery, inasmuch as the barrier protection was maintained by the inner glove in two of three cases in which the outer glove was perforated inadvertently. Plastic surgeons must balance the improved security of double gloving with the possible discomfort or reduced sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9091940     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199704000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

1.  The attitudes of British surgical trainees about the treatment of HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  Michelle Frances Griffin; Sandip Hindocha
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.

Authors:  J Tanner; H Parkinson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

3.  Surgeons' concern and practices of protection against bloodborne pathogens.

Authors:  J M Patterson; C B Novak; S E Mackinnon; G A Patterson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Knowledge, attitudes and practice of Iranian medical specialists regarding hepatitis B and C.

Authors:  Ali Kabir; Seyed Vahid Tabatabaei; Siamak Khaleghi; Shahram Agah; Amir Hossein Faghihi Kashani; Mehrdad Moghimi; Fahimeh Habibi Kerahroodi; Seyed-E-Hoda Alavian; Seyed Moayed Alavian
Journal:  Hepat Mon       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 0.660

5.  [Quality assurance and infection control in outpatient surgery].

Authors:  A Blaich; R Babikir; F Daschner; M Schweins; J Lambert; E Ingenhoven; P Gastmeier; M Dettenkofer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 0.920

6.  Glove Puncture During Liposuction: A Report of Two Cases.

Authors:  Shidlingappa Shirol; Priyadarshini Cooduvalli; Mahesh Prabhu
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

7.  Perforation of Surgical Gloves during Lower Extremity Fracture Surgery and Hip Joint Replacement Surgery.

Authors:  Sang Wook Lee; Myung-Rae Cho; Ho-Hyoung Lee; Won-Kee Choi; Joo-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2015-03-31

8.  Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training.

Authors:  Ian Thomson; Nicole Krysa; Andrew McGuire; Steve Mann
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Preventing Infection in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: Evaluating the Evidence for Common Practices and Standardized Protocols.

Authors:  Nusaiba F Baker; Owen Brown; Alexandra M Hart; Dora Danko; Christopher M Stewart; Peter W Thompson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-03-22

10.  Retrospective, Demographic, and Clinical Investigation of the Causes of Postoperative Infection in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Who Underwent Posterior Stabilization.

Authors:  Can Yaldiz; Mahizer Yaldiz; Nehir Ceylan; Ozlem Kitiki Kacira; Davut Ceylan; Tibet Kacira; Gokhan Kizilcay; Taner Tanriverdi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.