Literature DB >> 9090551

No time for handwashing!? Handwashing versus alcoholic rub: can we afford 100% compliance?

A Voss1, A F Widmer.   

Abstract

Handwashing is the most important and least expensive measure to prevent transmission of nosocomial infections. However, compliance rarely exceeds 40% under study conditions. Alcoholic hand disinfection (AHD) generally is used in Europe. In contrast, handwashing with medicated soap is practiced most frequently in the United States. Healthcare workers often explain the failure to comply with handwashing or AHD as due to the limited time available for this practice. We calculated a time consumption for handwashing and AHD in a representative model intensive-care unit with 12 healthcare workers, based on different compliance levels (40%, 60%, and 100%), duration of handwashing (40-80 seconds), and AHD (20 seconds). Comparing the extremes of our model, given 100% compliance, handwashing consumes 16 hours of nursing time per day shift, whereas AHD from a bedside dispenser requires only 3 hours (P = .01). We conclude that 100% compliance with handwashing may interfere with patient care and parltly explains the low compliance. In contrast, AHD, with its rapid activity, superior efficacy, and minimal time commitment, allows 100% healthcare-worker compliance without interfering with the quality of patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9090551     DOI: 10.1086/647590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  61 in total

Review 1.  The health professional's role in preventing nosocomial infections.

Authors:  H Saloojee; A Steenhoff
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Lavate vestras manus. Handwashing Liaison Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Hand Hygiene Revisited: Lessons from the Past and Present.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 4.  Hand hygiene--the case for evidence-based education.

Authors:  S P Stone
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Creating a manual for proper hand hygiene and its clinical effects.

Authors:  Shinya Kusachi; Yoshinobu Sumiyama; Youichi Arima; Yuichi Yoshida; Hidenori Tanaka; Youichi Nakamura; Jiro Nagao; Yosihisa Saida; Manabu Watanabe; Junko Sato
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Compliance of health care workers to hand hygiene: awareness of being observed is important.

Authors:  Eric Maury; Nael Moussa; Choukri Lakermi; Frederic Barbut; Georges Offenstadt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Effect of guideline implementation on costs of hand hygiene.

Authors:  Patricia W Stone; Sumya Hasan; Dave Quiros; Elaine L Larson
Journal:  Nurs Econ       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.085

8.  Factors associated with hand hygiene practices in two neonatal intensive care units.

Authors:  Bevin Cohen; Lisa Saiman; Jeannie Cimiotti; Elaine Larson
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 9.  Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Axel Kramer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 10.  Improving adherence to hand hygiene practice: a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  D Pittet
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.