Literature DB >> 9089081

The length distribution of perfect dimer repetitive DNA is consistent with its evolution by an unbiased single-step mutation process.

G I Bell1, J Jurka.   

Abstract

We have examined the length distribution of perfect dimer repeats, where perfect means uninterrupted by any other base, using data from GenBank on primates and rodents. Virtually no lengths greater than 30 repeats are found, except for rodent AG repeats, which extend to 35. Comparable numbers of long AC and AG repeats suggest that they have not been selected for special functions or DNA structures. We have compared the data with predictions of two models: (1) a Bernoulli Model in which bases are assumed equally likely and distributed at random and (2) an Unbiased Random Walk Model (URWM) in which repeats are permitted to change length by plus or minus one unit, with equal probabilities, and in which base substitutions are allowed to destroy long perfect repeats, producing two shorter perfect repeats. The source of repeats is assumed to be from single base substutions from neighboring sequences, i.e., those differing from the perfect repeat by a single base. Mutation rates either independent of repeat length or proportional to length were considered. An upper limit to the lengths L approximately 30 is assumed and isolated dimers are assumed unable to expand, so that there are absorbing barriers to the random walk at lengths 1 and L + 1, and a steady state of lengths is reached. With these assumptions and estimated values for the rates of length mutation and base substitution, reasonable agreement is found with the data for lengths > 5 repeats. Shorter repeats, of lengths </= 3 are in general agreement with the Bernoulli Model. By reducing the rate of length mutations for n </= 5, it is possible to obtain reasonable agreement with the full range of data. For these reduced rates, the times between length mutations become comparable to those suggested for a bottleneck in the evolution of Homo sapiens, which may be the reason for low heterozygosity of short repeats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9089081     DOI: 10.1007/pl00006161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  21 in total

1.  Domain-level differences in microsatellite distribution and content result from different relative rates of insertion and deletion mutations.

Authors:  David Metzgar; Li Liu; Christian Hansen; Kevin Dybvig; Christopher Wills
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Comparative genomic analysis of simple sequence repeats in three Plasmodium species.

Authors:  Suchi Tyagi; Meenu Sharma; Aparup Das
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Two distinct modes of microsatellite mutation processes: evidence from the complete genomic sequences of nine species.

Authors:  Daniel Dieringer; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Likelihood-based estimation of microsatellite mutation rates.

Authors:  John C Whittaker; Roger M Harbord; Nicola Boxall; Ian Mackay; Gary Dawson; Richard M Sibly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Mutability of Y-chromosomal microsatellites: rates, characteristics, molecular bases, and forensic implications.

Authors:  Kaye N Ballantyne; Miriam Goedbloed; Rixun Fang; Onno Schaap; Oscar Lao; Andreas Wollstein; Ying Choi; Kate van Duijn; Mark Vermeulen; Silke Brauer; Ronny Decorte; Micaela Poetsch; Nicole von Wurmb-Schwark; Peter de Knijff; Damian Labuda; Hélène Vézina; Hans Knoblauch; Rüdiger Lessig; Lutz Roewer; Rafal Ploski; Tadeusz Dobosz; Lotte Henke; Jürgen Henke; Manohar R Furtado; Manfred Kayser
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  On the structural differences between markers and genomic AC microsatellites.

Authors:  Fabio Pardi; Richard M Sibly; M J Wilkinson; John C Whittaker
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 7.  Mutational dynamics of microsatellites.

Authors:  Atul Bhargava; F F Fuentes
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.695

8.  Evolutionary process of a tetranucleotide microsatellite locus in Acipenseriformes.

Authors:  Zhao Jun Shao; Eric Rivals; Na Zhao; Sovan Lek; Jianbo Chang; Patrick Berrebi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.166

9.  Equilibrium distributions of microsatellite repeat length resulting from a balance between slippage events and point mutations.

Authors:  S Kruglyak; R T Durrett; M D Schug; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Local mutagenic impact of insertions of LTR retrotransposons on the mouse genome.

Authors:  Erick Desmarais; Khalid Belkhir; John Carlos Garza; François Bonhomme
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-10-29       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.