Literature DB >> 9088604

Glenoid fossa position in different facial types: a cephalometric study.

T Baccetti1, A Antonini, L Franchi, M Tonti, I Tollaro.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to analyse the position of the glenoid fossa in subjects with different sagittal and vertical skeletal features. A cephalometric study was carried out on a sample of 180 subjects (90 males and 90 females, aged 7-12 years) who were combined to form three groups (60 subjects each) according to skeletal sagittal relationships and three groups (60 subjects each) according to skeletal vertical relationships. Cephalometric analysis comprised both sagittal and vertical measurements for the assessment of the position of the glenoid fossa in relation to surrounding skeletal structures. As for sagittal measurements, TMJ position was more posterior in skeletal Class II when compared with skeletal Class III. In the vertical plane, the position of the glenoid fossa relative to basicranial structures was more caudal in low angle subjects when compared with subjects with normal or high angle vertical relationships. Both basicranial structures and the posterior nasal spine may be used as reference structures for the assessment of vertical position of the glenoid fossa in diagnosis and treatment planning.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9088604     DOI: 10.1093/ortho/24.1.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Orthod        ISSN: 0301-228X


  14 in total

1.  Radiological examination of the articular eminence morphology using cone beam CT.

Authors:  M A Sümbüllü; F Cağlayan; H M Akgül; A B Yilmaz
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  A computerized tomography study of the morphological interrelationship between the temporal bones and the craniofacial complex.

Authors:  Helder Nunes Costa; Rudolf Slavicek; Sadao Sato
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  A computed tomography-based comparative cephalometric analysis of the Italian craniofacial pattern through 2,700 years.

Authors:  S Cappabianca; L Perillo; V Esposito; F Iaselli; G Tufano; T G Thanassoulas; M Montemarano; R Grassi; A Rotondo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Correlation between condylar position and different sagittal skeletal facial types.

Authors:  Maryam Paknahad; Shoaleh Shahidi; Hajar Abbaszade
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  A cephalometric evaluation of the effect of glenoid fossa location on craniofacial morphology.

Authors:  Arvind Mengi; Vijay P Sharma; Pradeep Tandon; Akhil Agarwal; Abhishek Singh
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2016-06-21

6.  Morphometric analysis of the cranial base in Asians.

Authors:  Hong-Po Chang; Pao-Hsin Liu; Yu-Chuan Tseng; Yi-Hsin Yang; Chin-Yun Pan; Szu-Ting Chou
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 2.634

7.  3D Evaluation of the Relationship between Different Vertical Growth Patterns and Cranial Base Angulations.

Authors:  Mehmet Ugurlu; Rıdvan Oksayan; Ibrahim Sevki Bayrakdar; Fatih Kahraman; Ilhan Metin Dagsuyu; Mehmet Aydın; Kaan Orhan
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-08-05

8.  Disc position in clinically asymptomatic, pretreatment adolescents with Class I, II, or III malocclusion : A retrospective magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Hatice Gökalp
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  The relationship between temporomandibular joint disk displacement and mandibular asymmetry in skeletal Class III patients.

Authors:  Hyung-Joo Choi; Tae-Woo Kim; Sug-Joon Ahn; Shin-Jae Lee; Richard E Donatelli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  The aponeurotic tension model of craniofacial growth in man.

Authors:  Richard G Standerwick; W Eugene Roberts
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2009-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.