Literature DB >> 35573924

3D Evaluation of the Relationship between Different Vertical Growth Patterns and Cranial Base Angulations.

Mehmet Ugurlu1, Rıdvan Oksayan1, Ibrahim Sevki Bayrakdar2, Fatih Kahraman3, Ilhan Metin Dagsuyu1, Mehmet Aydın1, Kaan Orhan4.   

Abstract

Objective  This study aimed to compare cranial base angulations in subjects with high-angle, low-angle, and normal-angle vertical growth patterns using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Design  This study is a retrospective clinical research. Settings  This study was carried out at the Dentistry Faculty of Eskisehir Osmangazi University. Participants  According to skeletal vertical face growth patterns, 78 subjects (48 females and 30 males, average age: 13.19 ± 1.73 years) were divided equally into three groups: high angle, low angle, and normal angle groups. Main Outcome Measures  Cephalometric images were derived from CBCT, and patients were classified according to the SN-GoGn angle (sella-nasion, gonion gnathion angle). Sagittal, axial, and coronal cranial base angulations were measured in three-dimensional (3D) CBCT images. Data were analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U statistical tests. Results  There were statistically significant differences between the low-angle and high-angle groups according to sagittal cranial base angulation parameters ( p  = 0.01). Conversely, there were no statistically significant differences between vertical facial growth patterns according to coronal and axial cranial angle variables ( p  > 0.05). Conclusion  According to the study results, there were no effects of cranial base angulations in two planes (coronal and axial) on different vertical skeletal growth patterns. In the sagittal cranial base angulation parameter, the high-angle group showed greater angulation values than the low-angle group. CBCT may be helpful for evaluating, diagnosing, and predicting 3D cranial base differences. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cranial Base; cone beam computed tomography; three-dimensional; vertical face growth

Year:  2020        PMID: 35573924      PMCID: PMC9100433          DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  16 in total

1.  An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion.

Authors:  Ashish Dhopatkar; Suren Bhatia; Peter Rock
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Morphological associations between the Angle classes.

Authors:  J M Dibbets
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Glenoid fossa position in different facial types: a cephalometric study.

Authors:  T Baccetti; A Antonini; L Franchi; M Tonti; I Tollaro
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1997-02

Review 4.  Posterior cranial base natural growth and development: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kris Currie; Dena Sawchuk; Humam Saltaji; Heesoo Oh; Carlos Flores-Mir; Manuel Lagravere
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Evaluation of maxillary sinus volume and dimensions in different vertical face growth patterns: a study of cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Rıdvan Okşayan; Oral Sökücü; Seher Yeşildal
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Growth changes in the anterior and middle cranial bases assessed with cone-beam computed tomography in adolescents.

Authors:  Mona Afrand; Heesoo Oh; Carlos Flores-Mir; Manuel O Lagravère-Vich
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 7.  Anterior cranial-base time-related changes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mona Afrand; Connie P Ling; Siamak Khosrotehrani; Carlos Flores-Mir; Manuel O Lagravère-Vich
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Impacted maxillary canines and root resorptions of neighbouring teeth: a radiographic analysis using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Caroline S Lai; Michael M Bornstein; Lothar Mock; Benjamin M Heuberger; Thomas Dietrich; Christos Katsaros
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  How a computerized tomography examination changed the treatment plans of 80 children with retained and ectopically positioned maxillary canines.

Authors:  Krister Bjerklin; Sune Ericson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Cranial base features in skeletal Class III patients.

Authors:  Peter Proff; Florian Will; Ivan Bokan; Jochen Fanghänel; Tomas Gedrange
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.