Literature DB >> 9088558

Mental simulation of an action modulates the excitability of spinal reflex pathways in man.

M Bonnet1, J Decety, M Jeannerod, J Requin.   

Abstract

The question of whether mental simulation of an action has an effect on the spinal reflex circuits was examined in normal humans. Subjects were instructed either to exert or to mentally simulate a strong or a weak pressure on a pedal with the left or the right foot. Changes in the H- and T-reflexes activated by electrical and mechanical stimuli were measured on both legs during motor performance as well as during mental simulation of the same task. Asynchronous EMG activity of the soleus muscles was simultaneously recorded. Reflex excitability increased during performance of the pressure. It was larger when the H-reflex was triggered in the muscle involved in the task as compared to the contralateral side. Because actual performance modified the tension of the tendon and the location of the stimulus, ipsilateral changes of T-reflex amplitude could not be evaluated. Mental simulation of foot pressure in this condition resulted in a large increase of spinal reflex excitability, which was only slightly weaker than the reflex facilitation associated with the actual performance. Changes in T-reflex amplitude, but not in H-reflex amplitude, depended upon the lateralization and force of the simulated pressure, being larger in the leg involved in the simulation than in the contralateral leg, and larger for a strong than for a weak simulated movement. EMG activity was found to be weakly increased during mental imagery. This increase was significantly, although slightly, modulated by the lateralization and intensity of the imagined movement. However, no correlation was found across subjects between reflex amplitude and the amplitude of EMG activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9088558     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(96)00072-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  31 in total

1.  New evidence of corticospinal network modulation induced by motor imagery.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Florent Lebon; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Alain Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  How attentional focus on body sway affects postural control during quiet standing.

Authors:  Nicolas Vuillerme; Gilel Nafati
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-10-08

3.  Movement-related parameters modulate cortical activity during imaginary isometric plantar-flexions.

Authors:  Omar Feix do Nascimento; Kim Dremstrup Nielsen; Michael Voigt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The beat goes on: rhythmic modulation of cortical potentials by imagined tapping.

Authors:  Allen Osman; Robert Albert; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Guido Band; Maurits van der Molen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Emulation of computer mouse control with a noninvasive brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Dennis J McFarland; Dean J Krusienski; William A Sarnacki; Jonathan R Wolpaw
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by the social dimension of observed actions.

Authors:  Luisa Sartori; Andrea Cavallo; Giulia Bucchioni; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Spinal plasticity with motor imagery practice.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Florent Lebon; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Alain Martin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Mental practice with motor imagery: evidence for motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke.

Authors:  Andrew J Butler; Stephen J Page
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Influence of kinesthetic motor imagery and effector specificity on the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  Christopher J Forgaard; Ian M Franks; Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Body-specific motor imagery of hand actions: neural evidence from right- and left-handers.

Authors:  Roel M Willems; Ivan Toni; Peter Hagoort; Daniel Casasanto
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.