Literature DB >> 9084103

Vibromyography as a quantitative measure of muscle force production.

G O Matheson1, L Maffey-Ward, M Mooney, K Ladly, T Fung, Y T Zhang.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to investigate the use of vibromyography (VMG) as a tool for quantifying skeletal muscle force production. Fourteen healthy volunteers were pretested using a Cybex isokinetic dynamometer to determine their isometric quadricep maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) values. On the basis of these results, the subjects were separated into two groups: high-force ("HF" MVC mean = 289 ft.lb., range 254-330) and low-force ("LF" MVC mean = 154 ft.lb., range 101-198). A vibromyographic piezoelectric accelerometer (Dytran 3115A) and electromyographic (EMG) surface electrodes were affixed to the rectus femoris muscle and recordings were obtained at 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100% MVC. Root mean squares, median and mean values were computed from digitized data in the time domain while peak values were calculated from a fast Fourier transform for both the VMG and EMG data. A two-way repeated measures MANOVA using relative values and a linear regression model using absolute values were studied using BMDP and MiniTab software. Linear correlations were found between quadricept force and all EMG variables (R2 range 0.71-0.90) except peak (R2 = 0.39). The relationship between VMG and force was less linear (R2 range 0.19-0.69) because VMG values reach a plateau or even drop at 80% and 100% MVC. The HF-LF group differences were significant (p < 0.05), for all VMG values with the exception of root mean squares, but were not significant (p > 0.05) for all four EMG values. This study shows that, while EMG can discriminate force production within a given subject, VMG is a better discriminator of absolute muscle force values between subjects, particularly up to 60% MVC.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9084103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 0036-5505


  6 in total

1.  Mechanomyographic responses during voluntary ramp contractions of the human first dorsal interosseous muscle.

Authors:  Kumi Akataki; Katsumi Mita; Makoto Watakabe; Kunihiko Itoh
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Mechanomyographic amplitude and frequency responses during dynamic muscle actions: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Travis W Beck; Terry J Housh; Joel T Cramer; Joseph P Weir; Glen O Johnson; Jared W Coburn; Moh H Malek; Michelle Mielke
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 3.  The effectiveness of FES-evoked EMG potentials to assess muscle force and fatigue in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Morufu Olusola Ibitoye; Eduardo H Estigoni; Nur Azah Hamzaid; Ahmad Khairi Abdul Wahab; Glen M Davis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Mechanomyographic parameter extraction methods: an appraisal for clinical applications.

Authors:  Morufu Olusola Ibitoye; Nur Azah Hamzaid; Jorge M Zuniga; Nazirah Hasnan; Ahmad Khairi Abdul Wahab
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  New advances in mechanomyography sensor technology and signal processing: Validity and intrarater reliability of recordings from muscle.

Authors:  Claire Meagher; Enrico Franco; Ruth Turk; Samuel Wilson; Nathan Steadman; Lauren McNicholas; Ravi Vaidyanathan; Jane Burridge; Maria Stokes
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2020-04-09

6.  Estimation of Electrically-Evoked Knee Torque from Mechanomyography Using Support Vector Regression.

Authors:  Morufu Olusola Ibitoye; Nur Azah Hamzaid; Ahmad Khairi Abdul Wahab; Nazirah Hasnan; Sunday Olusanya Olatunji; Glen M Davis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.