Literature DB >> 12712352

Mechanomyographic responses during voluntary ramp contractions of the human first dorsal interosseous muscle.

Kumi Akataki1, Katsumi Mita, Makoto Watakabe, Kunihiko Itoh.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the mechanomyogram (MMG) and force relationship of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle as well as the biceps brachii (BB) muscle during voluntary isometric ramp contractions, and to elucidate the MMG responses resulting from the intrinsic motor unit (MU) activation strategy of FDI muscle with reference to the MMG of BB muscle. The subjects were asked to exert ramp contractions of FDI and BB muscle from 5% to 70% of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) at a constant rate of 10% MVC/s. In FDI muscle, the root-mean-squared amplitude (RMS) of the MMG decreased slowly with force up to 21%, and then a progressive increase was followed by a relatively rapid decrease beyond 41% MVC. The RMS/%MVC relationship in BB muscle consisted of an initial slow increase followed by a rapid increase from 23% MVC and a progressive decrease beyond 61% MVC. With respect to the mean power frequency (MPF), FDI muscle demonstrated no obvious inflection point in the MPF/%MVC relationship compared with that in BB muscle. Namely, the MPF of FDI muscle increased linearly through the force levels exerted. In contrast to FDI muscle, the MPF/%MVC relationship in BB muscle was decomposed into four specific regions: (1) a relative rapidly increase (<34% MVC), (2) a slow increment (34-53% MVC), (3) a temporary reduction (53-62% MVC), and (4) a further rapid increase (>62% MVC). The different MMG responses between FDI and BB muscles are considered to reflect the fact that the MU activation strategy varies among different muscles in relation to their morphology and histochemical type. Namely, the rate coding of the MUs plays a more prominent role in force production in relatively small FDI muscle than does MU recruitment compared with their respective roles in the relatively large BB muscle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12712352     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-003-0835-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  38 in total

1.  Muscle sounds during voluntary and stimulated contractions of the human adductor pollicis muscle.

Authors:  M J Stokes; R G Cooper
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1992-05

2.  Summation of elementary phonomyograms during isometric twitches in humans.

Authors:  M Petitjean; B Maton; A Fourment
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1998-05

3.  Differential responses in intramuscular pressure and EMG fatigue indicators during low- vs. high-level isometric contractions to fatigue.

Authors:  A G Crenshaw; S Karlsson; B Gerdle; J Fridén
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1997-08

4.  Vibromyography as a quantitative measure of muscle force production.

Authors:  G O Matheson; L Maffey-Ward; M Mooney; K Ladly; T Fung; Y T Zhang
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1997-03

5.  The mechanism of low-frequency sound production in muscle.

Authors:  J V Frangioni; T S Kwan-Gett; L E Dobrunz; T A McMahon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  The number of active motor units and their firing rates in voluntary contraction of human brachialis muscle.

Authors:  K Kanosue; M Yoshida; K Akazawa; K Fujii
Journal:  Jpn J Physiol       Date:  1979

7.  Muscle contraction generates discrete sound bursts.

Authors:  F V Brozovich; G H Pollack
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Low frequency sounds from sustained contraction of human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  G Oster; J S Jaffe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Behaviour of human motor units in different muscles during linearly varying contractions.

Authors:  C J De Luca; R S LeFever; M P McCue; A P Xenakis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Muscle sound and electromyogram spectrum analysis during exhausting contractions in man.

Authors:  C Orizio; R Perini; B Diemont; A Veicsteinas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992
View more
  11 in total

1.  Surface mechanomyogram amplitude is not attenuated by intramuscular pressure.

Authors:  K Søgaard; C Orizio; G Sjøgaard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Mechanomyographic and electromyographic time and frequency domain responses during submaximal to maximal isokinetic muscle actions of the biceps brachii.

Authors:  Travis W Beck; Terry J Housh; Glen O Johnson; Joseph P Weir; Joel T Cramer; Jared W Coburn; Moh H Malek
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Surface EMG and mechanomyogram disclose isokinetic training effects on quadriceps muscle in elderly people.

Authors:  Fabio Esposito; Emiliano Cè; Massimiliano Gobbo; Arsenio Veicsteinas; Claudio Orizio
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Electrical and mechanical response of finger flexor muscles during voluntary isometric contractions in elite rock-climbers.

Authors:  Fabio Esposito; Eloisa Limonta; Emiliano Cè; Massimiliano Gobbo; Arsenio Veicsteinas; Claudio Orizio
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Muscle-related differences in mechanomyography frequency-force relationships are model dependent.

Authors:  Trent J Herda; Michael A Cooper
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Endurance training alters motor unit activation strategies for the vastus lateralis, yet sex-related differences and relationships with muscle size remain.

Authors:  Stephanie A Sontag; Michael A Trevino; Trent J Herda; Adam J Sterczala; Jonathan D Miller; Mandy E Parra; Hannah L Dimmick; Jake Deckert
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  The effect of postactivation potentiation on the mechanomyogram.

Authors:  Norihiro Shima; Charles L Rice; Yoichi Ota; Kyonosuke Yabe
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 8.  Mechanomyographic amplitude and frequency responses during dynamic muscle actions: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Travis W Beck; Terry J Housh; Joel T Cramer; Joseph P Weir; Glen O Johnson; Jared W Coburn; Moh H Malek; Michelle Mielke
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Mechanomyographic parameter extraction methods: an appraisal for clinical applications.

Authors:  Morufu Olusola Ibitoye; Nur Azah Hamzaid; Jorge M Zuniga; Nazirah Hasnan; Ahmad Khairi Abdul Wahab
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Surface mechanomyography and electromyography provide non-invasive indices of inspiratory muscle force and activation in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Manuel Lozano-García; Leonardo Sarlabous; John Moxham; Gerrard F Rafferty; Abel Torres; Raimon Jané; Caroline J Jolley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.