Literature DB >> 9083316

A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices.

D Buser1, G Mora, F Arias.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of two prostaglandin derivatives, misoprostol and dinoprostone, for ripening the cervix and inducing labor in women with an unfavorable cervix.
METHODS: One hundred fifty-five women admitted for induction of labor to St. John's Mercy Medical Center, a teaching community hospital, were randomized to one of two methods: intravaginal misoprostol, 50 microg every 4 hours up to three doses (n = 76); and intracervical dinoprostone gel, 0.5 mg every 6 hours up to three doses (n = 79).
RESULTS: Misoprostol was more effective than dinoprostone in causing cervical ripening (P = .01), inducing labor (P < .001), shortening the duration of labor (P < .001), and decreasing the need for oxytocin augmentation (P < .001). Nonreassuring fetal heart monitoring patterns associated with hyperstimulation were significantly more frequent (P < .001), and the incidence of cesarean deliveries because of this indication was significantly higher (P = .002) in patients receiving misoprostol.
CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol is an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction, but it causes an increase in cesarean deliveries associated with uterine hyperstimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9083316     DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00015-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

Review 1.  Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Cynthia Pileggi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

2.  Shortening the induction delivery interval with prostaglandins: a randomized controlled trial of solo or in combination.

Authors:  Rajiv Mahendru; Shweta Yadav
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-06-01

3.  Labor Induction with 50 μg Vaginal Misoprostol: Can We Reduce Induction-Delivery Intervals Safely?

Authors:  Sweta Sareen; Indu Chawla; Pushpa Singh
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-04-12

Review 4.  A benefit-risk assessment of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction.

Authors:  Deborah A Wing
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for elective induction of labour in nulliparous women at full term: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Evangelos G Papanikolaou; Nikos Plachouras; Aikaterini Drougia; Styliani Andronikou; Christina Vlachou; Theodoros Stefos; Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Konstantinos Zikopoulos
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2004-09-27       Impact factor: 5.211

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.