Literature DB >> 12137560

A benefit-risk assessment of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction.

Deborah A Wing1.   

Abstract

Misoprostol, a prostaglandin E(1) analogue, is widely used in the US and other countries for cervical ripening and labour induction. Its use for these indications is not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The manufacturer of misoprostol issued a letter to American healthcare providers in August 2000, cautioning against the use of misoprostol in pregnant women and citing a lack of safety data for its use in obstetrical practice. The only FDA-approved indication in the product labelling is the treatment and prevention of intestinal ulcer disease resulting from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Multiple trials have proven that when applied vaginally, misoprostol is an effective agent for cervical ripening and labour induction in term pregnancy. The use of oxytocin augmentation is reduced when intravaginal misoprostol is used compared with other agents. Misoprostol use in obstetrics carries the added benefits of temperature stability at room temperature, which is unlike other prostaglandin preparations which require refrigeration or freezing, and reduced cost. However, debate continues regarding the optimal dose, dosage regimen, and route of administration. Uterine contraction abnormalities are often found in association with higher misoprostol doses (50 microg or more) given vaginally or orally. Some trials also indicate increased frequencies of meconium passage, neonatal acidaemia and caesarean delivery for fetal distress in women receiving higher doses of vaginally applied misoprostol. However, most trials fail to demonstrate a significant change in the caesarean delivery rate with the use of misoprostol, although a recent meta-analysis indicated that the use of intravaginal misoprostol is associated with a lowering of the caesarean rate when compared with pooled controls. Low-dose misoprostol (25 microg) is an effective agent for cervical ripening and labour induction when used in a judicious and cautious fashion. There are insufficient data to support the widespread use of oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Some trials suggest that this approach may be effective; however, the ideal dose and administration regimen have yet to be defined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12137560     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200225090-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  74 in total

Review 1.  Cervical ripening and labor induction after previous cesarean delivery.

Authors:  L Sanchez-Ramos; F L Gaudier; A M Kaunitz
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.190

2.  Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Authors:  P S Ramsey; P L Ogburn; D Y Harris; R H Heise; K D Ramin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Comparison of labor induction with misoprostol vs. oxytocin/prostaglandin E2 in term pregnancy.

Authors:  S Kadanali; T Küçüközkan; N Zor; Y Kumtepe
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  A randomized trial of misoprostol and oxytocin for induction of labor: safety and efficacy.

Authors:  R L Kramer; G J Gilson; D S Morrison; D Martin; J L Gonzales; C R Qualls
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Oral misoprostol vs. placebo in the management of prelabor rupture of membranes at term.

Authors:  R A Hoffmann; J Anthony; S Fawcus
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  Oral or vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor.

Authors:  M K Toppozada; M Y Anwar; H A Hassan; W S el-Gazaerly
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.561

7.  A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Authors:  D A Wing; D Ham; R H Paul
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Intravaginal misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent.

Authors:  H M Fletcher; S Mitchell; D Simeon; J Frederick; D Brown
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1993-07

9.  A comparison between 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction.

Authors:  J Srisomboon; S Singchai
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  1998-10

10.  A masked randomized comparison of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction.

Authors:  K A Bennett; K Butt; J M Crane; D Hutchens; D C Young
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Vaginal and Oral Doses of Misoprostol for Labour Induction in Post-Term Pregnancies.

Authors:  Masomeh Rezaie; Fariba Farhadifar; Susan Mirza Mohammadi Sadegh; Morteza Nayebi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.