Literature DB >> 908315

Occurrence and distribution of arsenic in soils and plants.

L M Walsh, M E Sumner, D R Keeney.   

Abstract

Inorganic arsenicals have been used in agriculture as pesticides or defoliants for many years and, in localized areas, oxides of arsenic have contaminated soils as a result of fallout from ore-smelting operations and coal-fired power plants. Use of inorganic arsenicals is no longer permitted in most agricultural operations, and recent air pollution controls have markedly reduced contamination from smelters. Thus, this paper will concentrate on the effect of past applications on arsenic accumulation in soil, phytotoxicity to and uptake by plants as influenced by soil properties, and alleviation of the deleterious effects of arsenic. Once incorporated into the soil, inorganic arsenical pesticides and arsenic oxides revert to arsenates, except where the soil is under reducing conditions. The arsenate ion has properties similar to that of orthophosphate, and is readily sorbed by iron and aluminum components. This reaction greatly restricts the downward movement (leaching) of arsenic in soils and the availability of arsenic to plants. Several methods of estimating plant available arsenic in soils have been developed. They involve extraction of the soil with reagents used to estimate phosphorus availability. This extractable arsenic is reasonably well correlated with reduced plant growth by, and plant uptake of arsenic. For most plants, levels of arsenic in the edible portion of the plant are well below the critical concentration for animal or human consumption, even when severe phytotoxicity occurs. Alleviation of arsenic phytotoxicity has been attempted by increasing the soil pH, by use of iron or aluminum sulfate, by desorbing arsenate with phosphate and subsequent leaching, and by cultural practices such as deep plowing. Only limited benefits have accrued from these procedures the cost of which is often prohibitively high. Since attempts to reduce arsenic toxicity have not been very successful, its excessive accumulation in soils should be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 908315      PMCID: PMC1637429          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.771967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  3 in total

1.  The problem of arsenic in American cigarette tobacco.

Authors:  H S SATTERLEE
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1956-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  ANTAGONISM OF CERTAIN ELEMENTS ESSENTIAL TO PLANTS TOWARD CHEMICALLY RELATED TOXIC ELEMENTS.

Authors:  A M Hurd-Karrer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1939-01       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Biological cycles for toxic elements in the environment.

Authors:  J M Wood
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-03-15       Impact factor: 47.728

  3 in total
  10 in total

1.  Analysis and assessment of heavy metals in soils around the industrial areas in Mettur, Tamilnadu, India.

Authors:  K Ramesh Kumar; V Anbazhagan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Are children playgrounds safe play areas? Inorganic analysis and lead isotope ratios for contamination assessment in recreational (Brazilian) parks.

Authors:  Ainara Gredilla; Silvia Fdez-Ortiz de Vallejuelo; Leticia Gomez-Nubla; Jose Antonio Carrero; Felipe B de Leão; Juan Manuel Madariaga; Luis F O Silva
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Bayesian importance parameter modeling of misaligned predictors: soil metal measures related to residential history and intellectual disability in children.

Authors:  Georgiana Onicescu; Andrew B Lawson; Suzanne McDermott; C Marjorie Aelion; Bo Cai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Metallurgy, environmental pollution and the decline of Etruscan civilisation.

Authors:  Adrian P Harrison; Ilenia Cattani; Jean M Turfa
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Multivariate Analysis of the Cotton Seed Ionome Reveals a Shared Genetic Architecture.

Authors:  Duke Pauli; Greg Ziegler; Min Ren; Matthew A Jenks; Douglas J Hunsaker; Min Zhang; Ivan Baxter; Michael A Gore
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Bacterial community and arsenic functional genes diversity in arsenic contaminated soils from different geographic locations.

Authors:  Yunfu Gu; Joy D Van Nostrand; Liyou Wu; Zhili He; Yujia Qin; Fang-Jie Zhao; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of Lead and Arsenic in Soils from Former Orchards on Growth of Three Plant Species.

Authors:  Bradley G Fritz; Delphine Appriou; Jonathan R Counts; Bradley E Sample; Amoret L Bunn; Jared F Dimson; Molly T West
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.218

8.  Assessment of the Driving Pollution Factors of Soil Environmental Quality Based on China's Risk Control Standard: Multiple Bigdata-Based Approaches with Intensive Sampling.

Authors:  Xiahui Wang; Nan Wei; Guohua Ji; Ruiping Liu; Guoxin Huang; Hongzhen Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Total and inorganic arsenic contents in some edible zingiberaceous rhizomes in Thailand.

Authors:  Chomkamon Ubonnuch; Suthep Ruangwises; Wandee Gritsanapan; Nongluck Ruangwises
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 10.  Sources, transport and alterations of metal compounds: an overview. I. Arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, and nickel.

Authors:  L Fishbein
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.