Literature DB >> 9082584

[The verification of optimized 3D-dosage distributions with an MR Fricke gel].

J Scherer1, L Bogner, M Herbst, A Müller-Broich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Complex 3D treatment planning techniques require a dose verification throughout the irradiated volume. Conventional dosimetry techniques only unsatisfyingly serve these needs. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: The chemical dosimeter FeSO4 solution can be used for measuring spatial dose distributions with the help of magnetic resonance imaging by fixing the iron ions in a gelatin matrix. A 3D dosimetry method was developed for 3D verification in an homogeneous, anthropomorphic phantom. The verification is achieved by juxtaposition or superposition of measured and calculated isodoses.
RESULTS: Different gel compositions were studied in view of their applicability as clinical 3D dosimeter concerning dose response, linearity and diffusion behaviour. A gel with 5% gelatin and 1 mM of ferrous ions proved to be the most suitable. The inverse spin-spin relaxation time T2(-1) is an indicator of the ferric ion concentration that showed to be linear with the dose in the range between 0 and 40 Gy (R2 = 0.996). The dose response was 0.057 per second and Gy. The observed diffusion of the iron ions was only influenced little by different gel compositions. To isolate the restrictions in the clinical application, measurements on the disturbing effects like, e.g. the inhomogeneous spatial response and the gel surface effects, were made and eliminated with the subtraction method. The clinical use of the method is demonstrated for the examples of the verification of calculated 3D dose distributions of a shielded 192Ir afterloading vaginal applicator and a head and neck 3-field plan with the use of asymmetric jaws and compensators.
CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates the clinical applicability of the method and shows its limitations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9082584     DOI: 10.1007/bf03039192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  9 in total

1.  Imaging of radiation dose by visible color development in ferrous-agarose-xylenol orange gels.

Authors:  A Appleby; A Leghrouz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Measurement of three-dimensional radiation dose distributions using MRI.

Authors:  P V Prasad; O Nalcioglu; B Rabbani
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  Radiation dosimetry using nuclear magnetic resonance: an introductory review.

Authors:  M J Day
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Accuracy and reproducibility of image derived relaxation times on a clinical 1.5 T magnetic resonance scanner.

Authors:  M E Masterson; R McGary; K Schmitt; J A Koutcher
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Correcting for rf inhomogeneities in multiecho pulse sequence MRI dosimetry.

Authors:  C Duzenli; D Robinson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Multiexponential proton spin-spin relaxation in MR imaging of human brain tumors.

Authors:  L R Schad; G Brix; I Zuna; W Härle; W J Lorenz; W Semmler
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Ferrous sulphate gels for determination of absorbed dose distributions using MRI technique: basic studies.

Authors:  L E Olsson; S Petersson; L Ahlgren; S Mattsson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Investigation of the tissue equivalence of gels used for NMR dosimetry.

Authors:  T Kron; P Metcalfe; J M Pope
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Measurement of radiation dose distributions by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging.

Authors:  J C Gore; Y S Kang; R J Schulz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.609

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  [Optimization of photon dose distributions with compensation].

Authors:  C Skalsky; L Bogner; M Herbst
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  [Dosimetry of a blood irradiator].

Authors:  L Bogner; P Härtl; J Scherer; M Treutwein; M Herbst
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.621

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.