Literature DB >> 9076866

Evaluation and management of heterotopic ossification in patients with spinal cord injury.

K Banovac1, F Gonzalez.   

Abstract

Sixty-three patients with paralysis secondary to spinal cord injury (SCI) were screened for heterotopic ossification (HO) by bone scintigraphy 27 +/- 14 (mean +/- SD) days after SCI. There were four female and 59 male patients, 36 had paraplegia and 27 tetraplegia. The age of patients was 28 +/- 9 years. Bone scintigraphy was obtained with a 3-phase test using 99m-technetium labeled diphosphonate, and the positive third phase was used as a criterion for diagnosis of HO. Bone scintigraphy was negative for HO in 27 patients (14 tetraplegic and 13 paraplegic) and positive in 36 patients (13 tetraplegic and 23 paraplegic). The patients with positive HO were treated with etidronate, first with an intravenous dose of 300 mg/day for 3 days, and then with an oral dose of 20 mg/kg/day for 6 months. The follow-up of patients consisted of clinical and radiographic evaluations every 2-4 months. The extent of HO was classified radiographically. In the treated group of patients who completed the entire course of etidronate therapy one patient developed HO, the remaining 28 (97%) patients had no radiographic evidence of HO during the follow-up of 10.6 +/- 4.5 months after initiation of therapy. Our data indicate that: (a) early HO can be detected in the asymptomatic patients using bone scintigraphy on the average of 4 weeks (27 +/- 14 days) after SCI and (b) the therapy with etidronate might be effective in the prevention of HO in majority of patients when the treatment is initiated in an early stage of heterotopic bone formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9076866     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  7 in total

1.  False-negative triple-phase bone scans in spinal cord injury to detect clinically suspect heterotopic ossification: a case series.

Authors:  Jelena N Svircev; Agnes S Wallbom
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 2.  A comparison of heterotopic ossification treatment within the traumatic brain and spinal cord injured population: An evidence based systematic review.

Authors:  Jo-Anne L Aubut; Swati Mehta; Nora Cullen; Robert W Teasell
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.138

Review 3.  Beliefs relating to recurrence of heterotopic ossification following excision in patients with spinal cord injury: a review.

Authors:  F Genêt; A Ruet; W Almangour; L Gatin; P Denormandie; A Schnitzler
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Neurogenic heterotopic ossification: epidemiology and morphology on conventional radiographs in an early neurological rehabilitation population.

Authors:  R Seipel; S Langner; T Platz; M Lippa; J P Kuehn; N Hosten
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The sensitivity of ultrasound screening examination in detecting heterotopic ossification following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  T Rosteius; E M Suero; D Grasmücke; M Aach; A Gisevius; M Ohlmeier; R Meindl; T A Schildhauer; M Citak
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Association between alendronate, serum alkaline phosphatase level, and heterotopic ossification in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Avraam Ploumis; Jayne M Donovan; Mobolaji O Olurinde; Dana M Clark; Jason C Wu; Douglas J Sohn; Kevin C O'Connor
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Impact of Heterotopic Ossification on Functional Recovery in Acute Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Steffen Franz; Lukas Rust; Laura Heutehaus; Rüdiger Rupp; Christian Schuld; Norbert Weidner
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 5.505

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.