BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis survive variceal bleeding better than patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and have less bleeding at liver transplantation. Recently, patients with primary biliary cirrhosis have been found to have a higher incidence of thrombosis in the portal venous tree. We hypothesized that primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis patients may be hypercoagulable. METHODS: We used thrombelastography, which is a simple technique for evaluating whole blood clotting and fibrinolysis, to establish if hypercoagulability was present, defined by thrombelastography values greater than 2SD over controls: r<19 mm (this reflects plasma clotting factors), maximum amplitude (ma) >60 mm, and alpha angle >43 degrees (these reflect platelets and fibrinogen levels). We evaluated 47 primary biliary cirrhosis and 21 primary sclerosing cholangitis patients, 40 with non-cholestatic cirrhosis and 40 healthy subjects as control groups with thrombelastography, full blood count, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time and, fibrinogen concentrations. In those with hypercoagulability we evaluated protein S, C, anti-thrombin III levels and activated protein C phenotype. RESULTS: All three thrombelastography abnormalities present together defined hypercoagulability: these were found in 13 of 47 (28%) primary biliary cirrhosis and in nine of 21 (43%) primary sclerosing cholangitis patients independent of cirrhosis, and bilirubin concentration, but in only 2 of 40 (5%) patients with noncholestatic cirrhosis and in none of the healthy controls (p<0.03 and p<0.0002, respectively). There was no correlation between the fibrinogen concentration (which was normal in all patients) or platelet count and the thrombelastography parameters. Only six of the 22 hypercoagulable patients had lower than normal values of protein S, C or antithrombin III. Activated protein C phenotype was normal in all. CONCLUSIONS: This diffference between biliary and parenchymal liver disease may have clinical implications, which need to be defined.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis survive variceal bleeding better than patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and have less bleeding at liver transplantation. Recently, patients with primary biliary cirrhosis have been found to have a higher incidence of thrombosis in the portal venous tree. We hypothesized that primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitispatients may be hypercoagulable. METHODS: We used thrombelastography, which is a simple technique for evaluating whole blood clotting and fibrinolysis, to establish if hypercoagulability was present, defined by thrombelastography values greater than 2SD over controls: r<19 mm (this reflects plasma clotting factors), maximum amplitude (ma) >60 mm, and alpha angle >43 degrees (these reflect platelets and fibrinogen levels). We evaluated 47 primary biliary cirrhosis and 21 primary sclerosing cholangitispatients, 40 with non-cholestatic cirrhosis and 40 healthy subjects as control groups with thrombelastography, full blood count, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time and, fibrinogen concentrations. In those with hypercoagulability we evaluated protein S, C, anti-thrombin III levels and activated protein C phenotype. RESULTS: All three thrombelastography abnormalities present together defined hypercoagulability: these were found in 13 of 47 (28%) primary biliary cirrhosis and in nine of 21 (43%) primary sclerosing cholangitispatients independent of cirrhosis, and bilirubin concentration, but in only 2 of 40 (5%) patients with noncholestatic cirrhosis and in none of the healthy controls (p<0.03 and p<0.0002, respectively). There was no correlation between the fibrinogen concentration (which was normal in all patients) or platelet count and the thrombelastography parameters. Only six of the 22 hypercoagulable patients had lower than normal values of protein S, C or antithrombin III. Activated protein C phenotype was normal in all. CONCLUSIONS: This diffference between biliary and parenchymal liver disease may have clinical implications, which need to be defined.
Authors: Nikita Joshi; Anna K Kopec; Jessica L Ray; Holly Cline-Fedewa; Atta Nawabi; Timothy Schmitt; Rance Nault; Timothy R Zacharewski; Cheryl E Rockwell; Matthew J Flick; James P Luyendyk Journal: Blood Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Diogo Sobreira Fernandes; Cátia C Pereira Real; Paula A Sá Couto Romão; Filinto B Marcos Correia De Barros; Isabel M Marques Aragão; Luis F Guimarães Fonseca; José M Gonçalves Aguiar; Teresa M Costa Branco; Zélia M Fernandes Moreira; Simão M Barros Esteves Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: R Todd Stravitz; Ton Lisman; Velimir A Luketic; Richard K Sterling; Puneet Puri; Michael Fuchs; Ashraf Ibrahim; William M Lee; Arun J Sanyal Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 25.083