Literature DB >> 9075444

Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence. Report of a physician survey.

S McFall1, A M Yerkes, M Bernard, T LeRud.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine practice patterns related to the evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence (UI).
DESIGN: Stratified random sample of physicians surveyed initially by mail with telephone follow-up.
SETTING: Four counties in Central Oklahoma. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-five physicians in 4 specialties: family practice, internal medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, and urology. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported evaluation and treatment of UI and training in treatment of UI. The overall rate of response was 80%.
RESULTS: Physicians miss opportunities to identify patients with UI. Despite substantial specialty variation, behavioral treatments and medications for UI, relative to the Agency for Health Care and Policy Research clinical guidelines, are underused. More than 40% of internists and family practitioners routinely recommended absorbent pads. Only 17% of physicians were aware of the clinical guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians identified deficiencies in their level of preparation to evaluate and treat UI. Reports of practice patterns also suggest deficiencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9075444     DOI: 10.1001/archfami.6.2.114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Fam Med        ISSN: 1063-3987


  9 in total

Review 1.  Addressing the need for a simpler algorithm for the management of women with urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Lars Viktrup
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-08-01

2.  Primary care providers' attitudes, knowledge, and practice patterns regarding pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Donna Mazloomdoost; Lauren B Westermann; Catrina C Crisp; Susan H Oakley; Steven D Kleeman; Rachel N Pauls
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Primary care providers' experience, management, and referral patterns regarding pelvic floor disorders: A national survey.

Authors:  Donna Mazloomdoost; Catrina C Crisp; Steven D Kleeman; Rachel N Pauls
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Urinary incontinence in Canada. National survey of family physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

Authors:  J Graham Swanson; Jennifer Skelly; Brian Hutchison; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Clinical approach to urinary incontinence: a comparison between internists and geriatricians.

Authors:  C Torres; J O Ciocon; D Galindo; D G Ciocon
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Analysis of the usage of continence pads and help-seeking behavior of women with stress urinary incontinence in Poland.

Authors:  Magdalena Emilia Grzybowska; Dariusz Wydra; Jerzy Smutek
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 7.  Developing an internationally-applicable service specification for continence care: systematic review, evidence synthesis and expert consensus.

Authors:  Adrian S Wagg; Diane K Newman; Kai Leichsenring; Paul van Houten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An investigation of factors predicting the type of bladder antimuscarinics initiated in Medicare nursing homes residents.

Authors:  Daniela C Moga; Qishan Wu; Pratik Doshi; Amie J Goodin
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  The handling of urinary incontinence in Danish general practices after distribution of guidelines and voiding diary reimbursement: an observational study.

Authors:  Lars Viktrup; Lars Alling Møller
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 2.497

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.