| Literature DB >> 12230293 |
C Torres1, J O Ciocon, D Galindo, D G Ciocon.
Abstract
To compare the initial approach and pattern of practice between internists and geriatricians in treating urinary incontinence. A retrospective chart review of 300 consecutive charts of elderly patients over the age of 65, seen by either internists (IM) or Geriatricians (GERI) for urinary incontinence at the Cleveland Clinic Florida was performed. The clinical approaches to the management of urinary incontinence were compared between IM and GERI groups by using a Student's t test. The mean age for these patients was 77 y for the IM group and 79 y for the GERI group. Majority of patients suffered from two chronic illnesses. We found that geriatricians performed more initial work up such as urodynamic testing before referring, while internists obtained more referrals to gynecologist with special interest in urologic disorders (currently called urogynecologist) without initial workup. IM and GERI groups equally prescribed medications for incontinence. However, the GERI group recommended Kegel exercises more frequently. This study showed that geriatricians manage urinary incontinence more extensively by performing more initial work up including urodynamics and providing initial behavioral therapy (Kegel exercise and toilet schedule) before referring to specialists. Perhaps geriatricians feel more comfortable treating urinary incontinence as shown by their lower frequency of referrals and are therefore more comfortable than internists at addressing this medical issue. On the contrary, the internist did the initial evaluation but preferred to get a referral perhaps due to less familiarity with urinary incontinence.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2001 PMID: 12230293 DOI: 10.1023/a:1019580322555
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Urol Nephrol ISSN: 0301-1623 Impact factor: 2.370