Literature DB >> 9074514

Whole-body FDG-PET imaging for staging of Hodgkin's disease and lymphoma.

C K Hoh1, J Glaspy, P Rosen, M Dahlbom, S J Lee, L Kunkel, R A Hawkin, J Maddahi, M E Phelps.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Accurate staging of Hodgkin's disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is important for treatment management. In this study, the utility of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) whole-body PET was evaluated as an imaging modality for initial staging or restaging of 7 HD and 11 NHL patients.
METHODS: Whole-body PET-based staging results were compared to the patient's clinical stage based on conventional staging studies, which included combinations of CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, MRI scans, gallium scans, lymphangiograms, staging laparatomies and bone scans.
RESULTS: Accurate staging was performed in 17 of 18 patients using a whole-body PET-based staging algorithm compared to the conventional staging algorithm in 15 of 18 patients. In 5 of 18 patients, whole-body PET-based staging showed additional lesions not detected by conventional staging modalities, whereas conventional staging demonstrated additional lesions in 4 of 18 patients not detected by whole-body PET. The total cost of conventional staging was $66,292 for 16 CT chest scans, 16 CT abdominal/pelvis scans, three limited MRI scans, four bone scans, five gallium scans, two laparotomies and one lymphangiogram. In contrast, scans cost $36,250 for 18 whole-body PET studies and additional selected correlative studies: one plain film radiograph, one limited CT, one bone marrow scan, one upper GI and one endoscopy.
CONCLUSION: A whole-body FDG-PET-based staging algorithm may be an accurate and cost-effective method for staging or restaging HD and NHL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9074514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  16 in total

1.  FDG PET in the management of lymphoma: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  P J Hoskin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-02-23       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  FDG PET in response evaluation of bulky masses in paediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients enrolled in the Italian AIEOP-LH2004 trial.

Authors:  Egesta Lopci; Maurizio Mascarin; Arnoldo Piccardo; Angelo Castello; Caterina Elia; Luca Guerra; Eugenio Borsatti; Alessandra Sala; Alessandra Todesco; Pietro Zucchetta; Piero Farruggia; Angelina Cistaro; Salvatore Buffardi; Patrizia Bertolini; Maurizio Bianchi; Maria Luisa Moleti; Feisal Bunkheila; Paolo Indolfi; Franca Fagioli; Alberto Garaventa; Roberta Burnelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Radiopharmaceuticals as probes to characterize tumour tissue.

Authors:  Israt S Alam; Mubarik A Arshad; Quang-Dé Nguyen; Eric O Aboagye
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Lymphoma: current status of clinical and preclinical imaging with radiolabeled antibodies.

Authors:  Christopher G England; Lixin Rui; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Analysis of 18F-FDG PET diffuse bone marrow uptake and splenic uptake in staging of Hodgkin's lymphoma: a reflection of disease infiltration or just inflammation?

Authors:  Pierre Y Salaun; Thomas Gastinne; Caroline Bodet-Milin; Loïc Campion; Pierre Cambefort; Anne Moreau; Steven Le Gouill; Christian Berthou; Philippe Moreau; Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Standardized uptake value on FDG-PET as a marker for disease activity in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: comparison with serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor values.

Authors:  Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Hiroyuki Sugahara; Ichiro Higuchi; Hiroki Fukunaga; Hironobu Nakamura; Yuzuru Kanakura; Jun Hatazawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  The majority of transformed lymphomas have high standardized uptake values (SUVs) on positron emission tomography (PET) scanning similar to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Authors:  A Noy; H Schöder; M Gönen; M Weissler; K Ertelt; C Cohler; C Portlock; P Hamlin; H W D Yeung
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Comparison of CT, PET, and PET/CT for staging of patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Barbara J Fueger; Kristen Yeom; Johannes Czernin; James W Sayre; Michael E Phelps; Martin S Allen-Auerbach
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 9.  Imaging 'the lost tribe': a review of adolescent cancer imaging. Part 1.

Authors:  P D Humphries; I Zerizer
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  On the added value of baseline FDG-PET in malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  Henriette Quarles van Ufford; Otto Hoekstra; Marie de Haas; Rob Fijnheer; Shulamiet Wittebol; Bianca Tieks; Mark Kramer; John de Klerk
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.