BACKGROUND: We compared standardized uptake values (SUVs) on positron emission tomography with a glucose analog, 2-[F-18] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG-PET) and serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) values in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in the pre-, mid- (after three or four cycles), and post-treatment periods of chemotherapy (pre, mid, and post, respectively), and we examined whether the SUV was a useful tumor marker for NHL. METHODS: The SUVs on PET and sIL-2R values were retrospectively evaluated based on all the clinical information available in 40 patients (31 in pre, 24 in mid, and 24 in the post periods). Patients in complete remission status were classified as group A and those with active residual disease in the mid and post periods were classified as group B. RESULTS: In pre, the SUV and sIL-2R values exhibited sensitivity of 100% and 84%, respectively. In mid, the SUV was lower in group A than in group B, while sIL-2R was not different. The SUV yielded better specificity than sIL-2R (88% vs. 25%, respectively), though the difference was not significant. In mid, the SUV in patients later assigned to group A in post was lower than than the SUV in group B, whereas sIL-2R was not different. In post, the specificity and accuracy of SUV were better than those of sIL-2R (95 vs. 47%, and 96 vs. 58%, respectively). Both the SUV and sIL-2R were lower in group A than in group B. CONCLUSION: The SUV on PET was better than the serum sIL-2R as a marker to evaluate the disease status of NHL, and was considered to be a useful tumor marker for NHL.
BACKGROUND: We compared standardized uptake values (SUVs) on positron emission tomography with a glucose analog, 2-[F-18] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG-PET) and serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) values in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in the pre-, mid- (after three or four cycles), and post-treatment periods of chemotherapy (pre, mid, and post, respectively), and we examined whether the SUV was a useful tumor marker for NHL. METHODS: The SUVs on PET and sIL-2R values were retrospectively evaluated based on all the clinical information available in 40 patients (31 in pre, 24 in mid, and 24 in the post periods). Patients in complete remission status were classified as group A and those with active residual disease in the mid and post periods were classified as group B. RESULTS: In pre, the SUV and sIL-2R values exhibited sensitivity of 100% and 84%, respectively. In mid, the SUV was lower in group A than in group B, while sIL-2R was not different. The SUV yielded better specificity than sIL-2R (88% vs. 25%, respectively), though the difference was not significant. In mid, the SUV in patients later assigned to group A in post was lower than than the SUV in group B, whereas sIL-2R was not different. In post, the specificity and accuracy of SUV were better than those of sIL-2R (95 vs. 47%, and 96 vs. 58%, respectively). Both the SUV and sIL-2R were lower in group A than in group B. CONCLUSION: The SUV on PET was better than the serum sIL-2R as a marker to evaluate the disease status of NHL, and was considered to be a useful tumor marker for NHL.
Authors: Bruce D Cheson; Beate Pfistner; Malik E Juweid; Randy D Gascoyne; Lena Specht; Sandra J Horning; Bertrand Coiffier; Richard I Fisher; Anton Hagenbeek; Emanuele Zucca; Steven T Rosen; Sigrid Stroobants; T Andrew Lister; Richard T Hoppe; Martin Dreyling; Kensei Tobinai; Julie M Vose; Joseph M Connors; Massimo Federico; Volker Diehl Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-01-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M S Kaminski; J Estes; K R Zasadny; I R Francis; C W Ross; M Tuck; D Regan; S Fisher; J Gutierrez; S Kroll; R Stagg; G Tidmarsh; R L Wahl Journal: Blood Date: 2000-08-15 Impact factor: 22.113