Literature DB >> 9071588

An introgression analysis of quantitative trait loci that contribute to a morphological difference between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana.

C C Laurie1, J R True, J Liu, J M Mercer.   

Abstract

Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana differ markedly in morphology of the posterior lobe, a male-specific genitalic structure. Both size and shape of the lobe can be quantified by a morphometric variable, PCl, derived from principal components and Fourier analyses. The genetic architecture of the species difference in PCl was investigated previously by composite interval mapping, which revealed largely additive inheritance, with a minimum of eight quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting the trait. This analysis was extended by introgression of marked segments of the mauritiana third chromosome into a simulans background by repeated backcrossing. The two types of experiment are consistent in suggesting that several QTL on the third chromosome may have effects in the range of 10-15% of the parental difference and that all or nearly all QTL have effects in the same direction. Since the parental difference is large (30.4 environmental standard deviations), effects of this magnitude can produce alternative homozygotes with little overlap in phenotype. However, these estimates may not reflect the effects of individual loci, since each interval or introgressed segment may contain multiple QTL. The consistent direction of allelic effects suggests a history of directional selection on the posterior lobe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9071588      PMCID: PMC1207799     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  8 in total

Review 1.  The nature of quantitative genetic variation revisited: lessons from Drosophila bristles.

Authors:  T F Mackay
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Searching for pattern and mutation in the Drosophila genome with a P-lacZ vector.

Authors:  E Bier; H Vaessin; S Shepherd; K Lee; K McCall; S Barbel; L Ackerman; R Carretto; T Uemura; E Grell
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps.

Authors:  E S Lander; D Botstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Continual change in mate preferences.

Authors:  Y Iwasa; A Pomiankowski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance.

Authors:  J Doebley; A Stec; C Gustus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross.

Authors:  M C deVicente; S D Tanksley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana.

Authors:  J Liu; J M Mercer; L F Stam; G C Gibson; Z B Zeng; C C Laurie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A genome-wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  J R True; B S Weir; C C Laurie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.562

  8 in total
  22 in total

1.  Detecting the undetected: estimating the total number of loci underlying a quantitative trait.

Authors:  S P Otto; C D Jones
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Analysis of quantitative trait locus effects on the size and shape of mandibular molars in mice.

Authors:  Michael Scott Workman; Larry J Leamy; Eric J Routman; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The genetic architecture necessary for transgressive segregation is common in both natural and domesticated populations.

Authors:  Loren H Rieseberg; Alex Widmer; A Michele Arntz; John M Burke
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Do quantitative trait loci (QTL) for a courtship song difference between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia coincide with candidate genes and intraspecific QTL?

Authors:  Jennifer M Gleason; Michael G Ritchie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Biological consequences of dosage dependent gene regulatory systems.

Authors:  James A Birchler; Hong Yao; Siva Chudalayandi
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2007-01-04

6.  The genetic basis of rapidly evolving male genital morphology in Drosophila.

Authors:  John P Masly; Justin E Dalton; Sudeep Srivastava; Liang Chen; Michelle N Arbeitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Pleiotropic quantitative trait loci contribute to population divergence in traits associated with life-history variation in Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  Megan C Hall; Christopher J Basten; John H Willis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Testing natural selection vs. genetic drift in phenotypic evolution using quantitative trait locus data.

Authors:  H A Orr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Interactions among dosage-dependent trans-acting modifiers of gene expression and position-effect variegation in Drosophila.

Authors:  U Bhadra; M P Bhadra; J A Birchler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  C P Klingenberg; L J Leamy; E J Routman; J M Cheverud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.