Literature DB >> 9069747

Promotion of wound healing with electrical stimulation.

L C Kloth1, J M McCulloch.   

Abstract

Clinicians involved in the conservative care of chronic wounds have many treatment interventions from which to choose, including debridement/irrigation, dressings, pressure-relieving devices, hyperbaric or topically applied oxygen, whirlpool/pulsed lavage, ultrasound, topical antibiotics, and cytokine growth factors. All except the last two interventions are physical treatments that create a wound-tissue environment conducive to healing. Unfortunately, many chronic wounds heal very slowly, do not heal, or worsen despite the best efforts of caregivers to promote tissue repair. An intervention commonly used to treat chronic wounds, especially by physical therapists, is electrical stimulation (ES). The rationale for use of this method is based on the fact that the human body has an endogenous bioelectric system that enhances healing of bone fractures and soft-tissue wounds. When the body's endogenous bioelectric system fails and cannot contribute to wound repair processes, therapeutic levels of electrical current may be delivered into the wound tissue from an external source. The external current may serve to mimic the failed natural bioelectric currents so that wound healing can proceed. Certain chemotaxic factors found in wound substrates contribute to tissue repair processes by attracting cells into the wound environment. Neutrophil, macrophage, fibroblast, and epidermal cells involved in wound repair carry either a positive or negative charge. When these cells are needed to contribute to autolysis, granulation tissue formation, anti-inflammatory activities, or epidermal resurfacing, ES may facilitate galvanotaxic attraction of these cells into the wound tissue and thereby accelerate healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9069747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Wound Care        ISSN: 1076-2191            Impact factor:   4.730


  17 in total

1.  In vitro electrical-stimulated wound-healing chip for studying electric field-assisted wound-healing process.

Authors:  Yung-Shin Sun; Shih-Wei Peng; Ji-Yen Cheng
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  A comparison study of immune-inflammatory response in electroacupuncture and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy.

Authors:  Guoyan Li; Shuqin Li; Lizhi Sun; Fangcai Lin; Baoguo Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

Review 3.  Polypyrrole-based conducting polymers and interactions with biological tissues.

Authors:  D D Ateh; H A Navsaria; P Vadgama
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Electrical Stimulation of Wound Healing: A Review of Animal Experimental Evidence.

Authors:  Giti Torkaman
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  A comparison study of immune-inflammatory response in electroacupuncture and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy.

Authors:  Guoyan Li; Shuqin Li; Lizhi Sun; Fangcai Lin; Baoguo Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

6.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) accelerates cutaneous wound healing and inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Authors:  Seren Gülşen Gürgen; Oya Sayın; Ferihan Cetin; Ayşe Tuç Yücel
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.092

Review 7.  Wound Healing Concepts in Clinical Practice of OMFS.

Authors:  Shruti Chhabra; Naveen Chhabra; Avneet Kaur; Niti Gupta
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-03-05

8.  High-voltage electrical stimulation for the management of stage III and IV pressure ulcers among adults with spinal cord injury: demonstration of its utility for recalcitrant wounds below the level of injury.

Authors:  Albert C Recio; Cara E Felter; Anna Corrine Schneider; John W McDonald
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Effects of physiological electric fields on migration of human dermal fibroblasts.

Authors:  Aihua Guo; Bing Song; Brian Reid; Yu Gu; John V Forrester; Colin A B Jahoda; Min Zhao
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 10.  Design features of implants for direct skeletal attachment of limb prostheses.

Authors:  M Pitkin
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 4.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.