Literature DB >> 9069134

Laparoscopic appendectomy-is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women.

S Laine1, A Rantala, R Gullichsen, J Ovaska.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis is most difficult in fertile-age women. In this patient group up to 50% of open appendectomies are negative for appendicitis. We conducted a randomized study to compare laparoscopic and open appendectomy in young female patients with suspected acute appendicitis.
METHODS: Fifty female patients between the ages of 16 and 40 years presenting with acute right lower abdominal pain were randomized, 25 to laparoscopy and 25 to an open appendectomy. Diagnostic accuracy, rate of negative appendectomies, safety, and final outcome were compared in the two groups.
RESULTS: Diagnosis was established in 96% of patients in the laparoscopic group and in 72% in the open group. There were 11 (44%) unnecessary appendectomies in the open group, but only one (4%) in the laparoscopic group (p < 0.0005).
CONCLUSIONS: In young women with right lower abdominal pain, laparoscopy can give precise diagnosis and reduce the rate of negative appendectomies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9069134     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  32 in total

Review 1.  The incidence and risk factors of post-laparotomy adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Galinos Barmparas; Bernardino C Branco; Beat Schnüriger; Lydia Lam; Kenji Inaba; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Cost perspectives of laparoscopic and open appendectomy.

Authors:  D E Moore; T Speroff; E Grogan; B Poulose; M D Holzman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Early laparoscopy as a routine procedure in the management of acute abdominal pain: a review of 1,320 patients.

Authors:  V Golash; P D Willson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review.

Authors:  M Kapischke; A Caliebe; J Tepel; T Schulz; J Hedderich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Jimmy B Y So; Ee-Cherk Chiong; Edmond Chiong; Wei-Keat Cheah; David Lomanto; Peter Goh; Cheng-Kiong Kum
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  James R Korndorffer; Erika Fellinger; William Reed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006-2008.

Authors:  Hossein Masoomi; Steven Mills; Matthew O Dolich; Noor Ketana; Joseph C Carmichael; Ninh T Nguyen; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Videolaparoscopic appendectomy: the current outlook.

Authors:  G C Roviaro; C Vergani; F Varoli; M Francese; R Caminiti; M Maciocco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiaohang Li; Jialin Zhang; Lixuan Sang; Wenliang Zhang; Zhiqiang Chu; Xin Li; Yongfeng Liu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.