Literature DB >> 9068829

Preattentive object files: shapeless bundles of basic features.

J M Wolfe1, S C Bennett.   

Abstract

A considerable body of recent evidence shows that preattentive processes can carve visual input into candidate objects. Borrowing and modifying terminology from Kahneman & Treisman (1984), this paper investigates the properties of these preattentive object files. Experiments 1-3 show that preattentive object files are loose collections of basic features. Thus, we can know preattentively that an object has the attributes "red" and "vertical" and yet have no idea if any part of the object is red and vertical. Experiment 4 shows that some information about the structure of an object is available preattentively, but Experiments 5-12 search for and fail to find any preattentive representation of overall shape. Appreciation of the overall shape of an object appears to require the binding together of local form features--a process that requires attention.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9068829     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00111-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  39 in total

1.  Responses to compound objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex: the whole is equal to the sum of the discrete parts.

Authors:  Arun P Sripati; Carl R Olson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues.

Authors:  Robert Rauschenberger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

3.  Curvature processing dynamics in macaque area V4.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Anitha Pasupathy; Scott L Brincat; Charles E Connor
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Visual feature binding requires reentry.

Authors:  Seth Bouvier; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-01-08

5.  A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization.

Authors:  Thomas Serre; Aude Oliva; Tomaso Poggio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  How the deployment of attention determines what we see.

Authors:  Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2006-08-01

7.  Why don't we see changes?: The role of attentional bottlenecks and limited visual memory.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Andrea Reinecke; Peter Brawn
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2006

8.  The binding problem lives on: comment on Di Lollo.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Angular declination and the dynamic perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; John W Philbeck; Philip W Wirtz; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Object-finding skill created by repeated reward experience.

Authors:  Ali Ghazizadeh; Whitney Griggs; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.