Literature DB >> 9068279

Bone formers: osteophyte and enthesophyte formation are positively associated.

J Rogers1, L Shepstone, P Dieppe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that enthesophyte formation and osteophyte growth are positively associated and to look for associations between bone formation at different sites on the skeleton so that a simple measure of bone formation could be derived.
METHODS: Visual examination of 337 adult skeletons. All common sites of either enthesophyte or osteophyte formation were inspected by a single observer who graded bone formation at these sites on a 0-3 scale. The total score for each feature was divided by the number of sites examined to derive an enthesophyte and an osteophyte score. Cronbach's alpha and principal components analysis were used to identify groupings.
RESULTS: Enthesophyte formation was associated with gender (M > F) and age. There was a positive correlation between enthesophytes and osteophytes (r = 0.65, 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 0.71) which remained after correction for age and gender. Principal components analysis indicated four different groupings of enthesophyte formation. By choosing one site from each group a simple index of total skeletal bone formation could be derived.
CONCLUSIONS: Osteophytes and enthesophytes are associated, such that a proportion of the population can be classified as "bone formers". Enthesophyte groupings provide some clues to aetiopathogenesis. Bone formation should be investigated as a possible determinant of the heterogeneity of outcome and of treatment responses in common musculoskeletal disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9068279      PMCID: PMC1752321          DOI: 10.1136/ard.56.2.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of visual and radiographic detection of bony changes at the knee joint.

Authors:  J Rogers; I Watt; P Dieppe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-10

2.  Senile ankylosing hyperostosis of the spine.

Authors:  J FORESTIER; J ROTES-QUEROL
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1950-12       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Radiographic and pathologic features of spinal involvement in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH).

Authors:  D Resnick; G Niwayama
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The relationship between osteophytes in the knee joint, osteoarthritis and aging.

Authors:  J Hernborg; B E Nilsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1973

5.  Hyperostosis of the spine in an adult population. Its relation to hyperglycaemia and obesity.

Authors:  H Julkunen; O P Heinonen; K Pyörälä
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Studies of osteophyte pathogenesis in experimentally induced osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R W Moskowitz; V M Goldberg
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Entheses and enthesopathy. Anatomical, pathological, and radiological correlation.

Authors:  D Resnick; G Niwayama
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH): Forestier's disease with extraspinal manifestations.

Authors:  D Resnick; S R Shaul; J M Robins
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 11.105

  8 in total
  35 in total

1.  The shape of the distal femur: a palaeopathological comparison of eburnated and non-eburnated femora.

Authors:  L Shepstone; J Rogers; J Kirwan; B Silverman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Is ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament an enthesopathy?

Authors:  Jian Chen; Dianwen Song; Xinwei Wang; Xiaolong Shen; Yang Li; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Where tendons and ligaments meet bone: attachment sites ('entheses') in relation to exercise and/or mechanical load.

Authors:  M Benjamin; H Toumi; J R Ralphs; G Bydder; T M Best; S Milz
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Pattern of osteophytes and enthesophytes in the proximal ulna: an anatomic, paleopathologic, and radiologic study.

Authors:  A Esposito; S C L Souto; O A Catalano; A S Doria; P B S Trigo; D Resnick
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Bone eburnation in rheumatic diseases: a guiding trace in today's radiological diagnosis and in paleopathology.

Authors:  R Lagier
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 6.  Osteoarthritis revisited---again!

Authors:  Iain Watt
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Do cervical degenerative diseases associate with foreign body sensation of the pharynx?

Authors:  Ming-Tse Ko; Hsiu-Ling Chen; Jyh-Ping Peng; Te-Yen Lin; Wei-Che Lin
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Distribution of distal femoral osteophytes in a human skeletal population.

Authors:  L Shepstone; J Rogers; J Kirwan; B Silverman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Chronic desmitis and enthesiophytosis of the radio-ulnar interosseous ligament in a dog.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Deffontaines; Bertrand Lussier; Christian Bolliger; Agathe Bédard; Monique Doré; William E Blevins
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.008

10.  Proximal tibial osteophytes and their relationship with the height of the tibial spines of the intercondylar eminence: paleopathological study.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Hayeri; Masoud Shiehmorteza; Debra J Trudell; Tori Heflin; Tori Hefflin; Donald Resnick
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.