Literature DB >> 10343520

The shape of the distal femur: a palaeopathological comparison of eburnated and non-eburnated femora.

L Shepstone1, J Rogers, J Kirwan, B Silverman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the difference in shape of the distal femur, viewed axially in two dimensions, between eburnated and non-eburnated femora.
METHODS: A comparison of 52 non-eburnated and 16 eburnated femora drawn from a large archeological skeletal population. Eburnation was taken to indicate late stage osteoarthritis. Shape variability, based on landmarks, was quantified using a principal components analysis after a Procrustes alignment.
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups. This was with respect to the patellar groove and the shape of the medial condyle. The latter difference is consistent with bone remodelling as a knee stabilising mechanism.
CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical shape can be quantified using an uncomplicated statistical technique. It was used to quantify the shape of the distal femur and demonstrate shape differences associated with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10343520      PMCID: PMC1752825          DOI: 10.1136/ard.58.2.72

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  26 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Zoetermeer survey. Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Dutch population with that in 10 other populations.

Authors:  J L van Saase; L K van Romunde; A Cats; J P Vandenbroucke; H A Valkenburg
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Instability of the knee. A long-term experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  J L Marshall; S E Olsson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The anatomy and functional axes of the femur.

Authors:  Y Yoshioka; D Siu; T D Cooke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Osteoarthritis: pathogenesis and aetiology.

Authors:  P G Bullough
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1984-08

6.  Bone and cartilage changes following experimental varus or valgus tibial angulation.

Authors:  D D Wu; D B Burr; R D Boyd; E L Radin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Obesity and knee osteoarthritis. The Framingham Study.

Authors:  D T Felson; J J Anderson; A Naimark; A M Walker; R F Meenan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study.

Authors:  D T Felson; A Naimark; J Anderson; L Kazis; W Castelli; R F Meenan
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1987-08

9.  Gross pathological changes in the knee joint of the aged individual: a study of 300 cases.

Authors:  S W Casscells
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The geometry of diarthrodial joints, its physiologic maintenance, and the possible significance of age-related changes in geometry-to-load distribution and the development of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  P G Bullough
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  6 in total

1.  Asymmetrical total knee arthroplasty does not improve patella tracking: a study without patella resurfacing.

Authors:  Marco Barink; Huub Meijerink; Nico Verdonschot; Albert van Kampen; Maarten de Waal Malefijt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A computerized analysis of femoral condyle radii in ACL intact and contralateral ACL reconstructed knees using 3D CT.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Jeremie Axe; James J Irrgang; Kang Li; Kanglai Li; Scott Tashman; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Distribution of distal femoral osteophytes in a human skeletal population.

Authors:  L Shepstone; J Rogers; J Kirwan; B Silverman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Shape of the intercondylar notch of the human femur: a comparison of osteoarthritic and non-osteoarthritic bones from a skeletal sample.

Authors:  L Shepstone; J Rogers; J R Kirwan; B W Silverman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Statistical shape modeling describes variation in tibia and femur surface geometry between Control and Incidence groups from the osteoarthritis initiative database.

Authors:  Todd L Bredbenner; Travis D Eliason; Ryan S Potter; Robert L Mason; Lorena M Havill; Daniel P Nicolella
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Structural and functional maturation of distal femoral cartilage and bone during postnatal development and growth in humans and mice.

Authors:  Elaine F Chan; Ricky Harjanto; Hiroshi Asahara; Nozomu Inoue; Koichi Masuda; William D Bugbee; Gary S Firestein; Harish S Hosalkar; Martin K Lotz; Robert L Sah
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.472

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.