Literature DB >> 9068193

An improved method to recover saliva from human skin: the double swab technique.

D Sweet1, M Lorente, J A Lorente, A Valenzuela, E Villanueva.   

Abstract

Human bite mark evidence is often found in violent crimes. Due to the difficulties of physically comparing an injury site on elastic and curved skin surfaces to the teeth of a suspect, the authors have considered using salivary DNA evidence to identify the bite perpetrator. Several techniques were evaluated to determine the best method of recovering saliva from human skin before extracting genomic DNA from the collection substrate. A classical stain recovery technique using a wet cotton swab was tested against one utilizing a wet filter paper. Additionally, a new method, referred to as the double swab technique, using a wet cotton swab followed by a dry cotton swab was also evaluated. After recovering a dried saliva stain, DNA was extracted using the modified Chelex method, quantified using the slot-blot procedure, and amplified at three polymorphic loci. The double swab technique showed the highest percentage recovery of saliva from human skin among the three methods studied. This technique is suggested as an improvement over the classical single wet cotton swab technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9068193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  21 in total

1.  An easily automated, closed-tube forensic DNA extraction procedure using a thermostable proteinase.

Authors:  D Moss; S A Harbison; D J Saul
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Vaginal microbial flora analysis by next generation sequencing and microarrays; can microbes indicate vaginal origin in a forensic context?

Authors:  Corina C G Benschop; Frederike C A Quaak; Mathilde E Boon; Titia Sijen; Irene Kuiper
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Recovery of salivary DNA from the skin after showering.

Authors:  Shane Williams; Edward Panacek; William Green; Sree Kanthaswamy; Christopher Hopkins; Cassandra Calloway
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  Evaluation of the efficiency of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabs for recovery of DNA from metal surfaces.

Authors:  Dan O M Bonsu; Denice Higgins; Julianne Henry; Jeremy J Austin
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.007

5.  Are they dermatological lesions, bottle top burns or bite mark injuries?

Authors:  Jayanie B Weeratna
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2014-07-01

6.  Amplification of oral streptococcal DNA from human incisors and bite marks.

Authors:  Lillian Hsu; Daniel Power; Jenine Upritchard; Jeremy Burton; Rebekah Friedlander; Jacqui Horswell; Catriona MacDonald; Jules Kieser; Geoffrey Tompkins
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Comparison of the effects of sterilisation techniques on subsequent DNA profiling.

Authors:  Kirsty Shaw; Ivana Sesardić; Nikki Bristol; Carole Ames; Kathryn Dagnall; Caryn Ellis; Fiona Whittaker; Barbara Daniel
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  How long does it take a static speaking individual to contaminate the immediate environment?

Authors:  Nicholas J Port; Victoria L Bowyer; Eleanor A M Graham; Madu S Batuwangala; Guy N Rutty
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.456

9.  Forensic trace DNA: a review.

Authors:  Roland Ah van Oorschot; Kaye N Ballantyne; R John Mitchell
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2010-12-01

10.  Practical aspects of DNA-based forensic studies in dentistry.

Authors:  J Muruganandhan; G Sivakumar
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2011-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.