Literature DB >> 9065831

Detection of a membrane shunt by DC field polarization during intracellular and whole cell recording.

G Svirskis1, A Gutman, J Hounsgaard.   

Abstract

Lower input resistance with intracellular recording, rather than with whole cell recording, usually has been ascribed to a shunt produced by penetration injury. An alternative explanation is a higher input resistance during whole cell recording due to wash-out of cytoplasmatic substances. We have used neuronal polarization at the onset and termination of an applied electric field for shunt detection. An analytical expression was derived for field-induced polarization in a shunted ohmic cable. When the shunt is negligible, the transient response to a step in DC field decays much faster than the response to current injected through the recording electrode. In the case of a significant shunt an over- and undershoot of the transmembrane potential appear at the shunted end when the field is switched on and off. Over- and undershoot decay with the same slowest time constant as the response to injected current. The results for the cable are generalized for nonuniform fields and arbitrary branching neurons with homogeneous membrane. The field effect was calculated for two reconstructed neurons with different branching pattern. The calculations confirmed the theoretical inferences. The field polarization can be used for shunt detection. The theory was checked experimentally in 18 ventral neurons in transverse slices of the turtle spinal cord. In seven neurons, field-induced under- and overshoots were observed when sharp electrodes were used. This indicates the presence of an injury shunt. In the remaining 11 neurons, however, there were no under- or overshoots, indicating that a shunt is not always induced. When patch electrodes were used, the seal quality was checked by inducing a spike with a strong field stimulus before and after the rupture of the membrane. When the threshold field strength for spike initiation was not changed by membrane rupture, under- and overshoots were not observed. This was taken to indicate a good seal. In such recordings under- and overshoots were observed when a shunt was induced by local application of glycine. The fast and monotonic response to weak field stimulation suggests homogeneous electric properties of the soma-dendritic membrane when active conductances are not recruited. We propose using polarization by weak DC fields to ensure the quality of recordings with sharp and whole cell electrodes and for checking the ohmic homogeneity of the membrane. These controls are particularly important for evaluation of electrotonic parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9065831     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.2.579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  9 in total

1.  An estimator for the electrotonic size of neurons independent of charge equalization time constants.

Authors:  Armantas Baginskas; Morten Raastad
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Motoneurons have different membrane resistance during fictive scratching and weight support.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Perreault
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Masashi Inoue; Hiroki Akiyama; Jackie K Deans; John E Fox; Hiroyoshi Miyakawa; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Local facilitation of plateau potentials in dendrites of turtle motoneurones by synaptic activation of metabotropic receptors.

Authors:  R Delgado-Lezama; J F Perrier; J Hounsgaard
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  An analytic solution of the cable equation predicts frequency preference of a passive shunt-end cylindrical cable in response to extracellular oscillating electric fields.

Authors:  Hiromu Monai; Toshiaki Omori; Masato Okada; Masashi Inoue; Hiroyoshi Miyakawa; Toru Aonishi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Electrotonic measurements by electric field-induced polarization in neurons: theory and experimental estimation.

Authors:  G Svirskis; A Baginskas; J Hounsgaard; A Gutman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Asif Rahman; Belen Lafon; Gregory Kronberg; Doris Ling; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Field effects in the CNS play functional roles.

Authors:  Shennan A Weiss; Donald S Faber
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  Neuronal recordings with solid-conductor intracellular nanoelectrodes (SCINEs).

Authors:  Matthew R Angle; Andreas T Schaefer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.