Literature DB >> 9065630

Ocular torsion induced by static and dynamic visual stimulation and static whole body roll.

H Kingma1, P Stegeman, R Vogels.   

Abstract

By means of real-time infra-red video-oculography we studied eye torsion in 12 normal healthy subjects. Ocular torsion was induced by visual stimulation or static whole body roll with and without visual orientation ("head-fixed" or "earth-fixed"). Visual stimulation was achieved by a horizontal grating that oscillated sinusoidally in a frontal plane. The oscillation frequency varied from 0 to 0.6 Hz while amplitude varied from 6 degrees to 33 degrees. Visual orientation during whole body roll was established by mounting a 32 lx illuminated horizontal grating either on a tilting device (head-fixed) or on the wall in the frontal plane (earth-fixed). Maximum visual-induced eye torsion gain was reached at about 0.2 Hz. No eye torsion was observed in static (0 Hz) visual tilts of the grating. Maximum gain was about 0.36 at amplitudes between 6 degrees and 10 degrees. Eye torsion gain decreased with increasing amplitude and increasing frequency (> 0.2 Hz). Static whole body roll in the dark up to 180 degrees clockwise and counterclockwise induced static ocular counter rolling with a maximum amplitude of 12 degrees and a maximum gain of 0.22. Gain decreased with increasing roll down to zero at 180 degrees. Visual orientation with either head or earth fixed did not affect the amplitude or gain of the body roll induced ocular counter-rolling. The results are interpreted in terms of improving the reliability of clinical statolith testing and understanding the processes involved in motion sickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9065630     DOI: 10.1007/bf02439726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  4 in total

1.  Human ocular torsion during parabolic flights: an analysis with scleral search coil.

Authors:  B S Cheung; K Money; I Howard; N Kirienko; W Johnson; J Lackner; P Dizio; J Evanoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Eye torsion elicited by oscillating gratings: effects of orientation, wavelength and stationary contours.

Authors:  L J Van Rijn; J Van der Steen; H Collewijn
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Real time binocular detection of horizontal vertical and torsional eye movements by an infra red video-eye tracker.

Authors:  H Kingma; H Gullikers; I de Jong; R Jongen; M Dolmans; P Stegeman
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1995

4.  Human ocular torsional position before and after unilateral vestibular neurectomy.

Authors:  I S Curthoys; M J Dai; G M Halmagyi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total
  14 in total

1.  Effects of earth-fixed vs head-fixed targets on static ocular counterroll.

Authors:  Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Zahra Hirji; Herbert C Goltz; Giuseppe Mirabella; Alan W Blakeman; Linda Colpa; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04

2.  The video ocular counter-roll (vOCR): a clinical test to detect loss of otolith-ocular function.

Authors:  Jorge Otero-Millan; Carolina Treviño; Ariel Winnick; David S Zee; John P Carey; Amir Kheradmand
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Static ocular counterroll: video-based analysis after minimizing the false-torsion factors.

Authors:  Ichiro Hamasaki; Satoshi Hasebe; Hiroshi Ohtsuki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Visual spatial clues enhance ocular torsion response during visual tilt.

Authors:  Tony Pansell; Ulrika Sverkersten; Jan Ygge
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Vertical eye position responses to steady-state sinusoidal fore-aft head translation in monkeys.

Authors:  Yoshiro Wada; Yasushi Kodaka; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effects of age, viewing distance and target complexity on static ocular counterroll.

Authors:  Herbert C Goltz; Giuseppe Mirabella; Joanne C Y Leung; Alan W Blakeman; Linda Colpa; Khaled Abuhaleeqa; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Understanding skew deviation and a new clinical test to differentiate it from trochlear nerve palsy.

Authors:  Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.220

8.  Binocular Alignment Changes Between Sitting and Supine Positions in Patients with Dizziness.

Authors:  Matthew Ryan Tan; Jorge Serrador; Jamie Perin; Yoav Gimmon; Jennifer Millar; Kelly Brewer; Dan Gold; Michael C Schubert
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-22

9.  Precision and accuracy of the subjective haptic vertical in the roll plane.

Authors:  Jeanine R Schuler; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Alexander A Tarnutzer
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Causal Inference in the Perception of Verticality.

Authors:  Ksander N de Winkel; Mikhail Katliar; Daniel Diers; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.