Literature DB >> 9063298

Trusting in the future: the distinct advantage of nonprofit HMOs.

D M Lawrence1, P H Mattingly, J M Ludden.   

Abstract

Managed care's success in improving the health status of communities can be directly attributed to the not-for-profits. Three of the major organizations-Harvard Community Health Plan, Kaiser Permanente, and Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound-in this category have participated in the critical public policy debates of the past 30 years, have conducted and funded data-based research, and have trained numerous U.S. primary care physicians for practice. An emphasis on health, rather than profits, has led tham to favour community rating. Not-for-profits have created an environment that encourages good relationships between patients and professional caregivers. They have discovered that delivering superior care is the most effective way to control costs, and they have done this while fostering partnerships with organized labor. It is critical for the not-for-profits to communicate their obvious advantages to the general public in order to ensure their survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9063298      PMCID: PMC2751040          DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.00042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN: 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  6 in total

Review 1.  Nonprofit to for-profit conversions by hospitals, health insurers, and health plans.

Authors:  J Needleman
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  The contributions of managed care plans to public health practice: evidence from the nation's largest local health departments.

Authors:  G P Mays; P K Halverson; R Stevens
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Profit-seeking, corporate control, and the trustworthiness of health care organizations: assessments of health plan performance by their affiliated physicians.

Authors:  Mark Schlesinger; Nicole Quon; Matthew Wynia; Deborah Cummins; Bradford Gray
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Socioeconomic Differences in Use of Low-Value Cancer Screenings and Distributional Effects in Medicare.

Authors:  Wendy Yi Xu; Jeah Kyoungrae Jung
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Psychiatric inpatient expenditures and public health insurance programmes: analysis of a national database covering the entire South Korean population.

Authors:  Woojin Chung
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Use of preventive care services, beneficiary characteristics, and Medicare HMO performance.

Authors:  J Greene; J Blustein; K A Laflamme
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2001
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.