Literature DB >> 9062881

Computer-based clinical decision aids. A review of methods and assessment of systems.

Y Reisman1.   

Abstract

During the last three decades a great deal of research has been devoted to the development of integrated clinical decision support systems. This report aims to give a basic understanding of what is required for such a system. By means of a large literature study a survey is given of the major components of computer-based clinical aid systems. The main approaches and several aspects of evaluation of such programs are described. The computer has several inherent capabilities which are suitable for medical problem solving and can help in the formalization of medical knowledge. The components of such systems include the computer database, the reasoning engine and the user interface. The different approaches on which the reasoning engine is built are based on manipulation of information and advocate the use of knowledge to construct a solution to a problem. The information in the mode vary from data-intensive to knowledge-intensive. Assessment of decision support systems is a very important phase in the development of such systems. Evaluation should be made on the accuracy of the program, the nature of the system, the use of the data and the acceptance by the target users. Whatever the model is, its effectiveness will depend on the data with which the program has to work. Acceptance by physicians depends among other things on ease of use of the user interface. Profound changes in the delivery of health care will be induced through the rapid growth of on-line computer communication together with the development of integrated clinical decision support systems and electronic medical records. Notwithstanding the rapid growth of computer technology, computer-aided decision making is in its infancy and real support in daily practice is not yet achieved.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9062881     DOI: 10.3109/14639239609025356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Inform (Lond)        ISSN: 0307-7640


  6 in total

1.  An artificial neural network improves prediction of observed survival in patients with laryngeal squamous carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew S Jones; Azzam G F Taktak; Timothy R Helliwell; John E Fenton; Martin A Birchall; David J Husband; Anthony C Fisher
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Provider use of and attitudes towards an active clinical alert: a case study in decision support.

Authors:  J Feblowitz; S Henkin; J Pang; H Ramelson; L Schneider; F L Maloney; A R Wilcox; D W Bates; A Wright
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 3.  Multicriteria decision analysis in oncology.

Authors:  Georges Adunlin; Vakaramoko Diaby; Alberto J Montero; Hong Xiao
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the United States: still room for improvement.

Authors:  Diane Sliwka; Margaret C Fang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Human factors barriers to the effective use of ten HIV clinical reminders.

Authors:  Emily S Patterson; Anh D Nguyen; James P Halloran; Steven M Asch
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-10-05       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  Managing diagnostic uncertainty in primary care: a systematic critical review.

Authors:  Rahul Alam; Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi; Maria Panagioti; Aneez Esmail; Stephen Campbell; Efharis Panagopoulou
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.497

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.